Macon County Local Demographic Profile

Macon County, Illinois — key demographics

Population size

  • 100,700 (2024 Census Bureau estimate, PEP)
  • 103,998 (2020 Census count)

Age

  • Median age: ~41.0 years (ACS 2023)
  • Under 18: ~22%
  • 18–64: ~58%
  • 65 and over: ~20%

Gender

  • Female: ~51.6%
  • Male: ~48.4% (ACS 2023)

Racial/ethnic composition (mutually exclusive; Hispanic can be any race)

  • Non-Hispanic White: ~75–76%
  • Non-Hispanic Black: ~18–19%
  • Hispanic/Latino (any race): ~3%
  • Non-Hispanic Two or more races: ~2–3%
  • Non-Hispanic Asian: ~0.7%
  • Other races (incl. AIAN, NHPI): <1% combined (ACS 2023)

Household data

  • Households: ~43,500
  • Average household size: ~2.30
  • Family households: ~59% of households
  • Married-couple households: ~44% of households
  • One-person households: ~32%
  • Households with children under 18: ~28%
  • Tenure: ~67% owner-occupied, ~33% renter-occupied (ACS 2023)

Insights

  • Continued population decline since 2020; aging age structure with roughly one in five residents 65+.
  • Predominantly non-Hispanic White with a sizable Black population and small but growing Hispanic community.
  • Smaller household sizes and a majority of family households; homeownership about two-thirds.

Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, 2024 Population Estimates Program (PEP); 2023 American Community Survey (ACS) 1-year; 2020 Decennial Census. Estimates are subject to ACS sampling error.

Email Usage in Macon County

  • Population and connectivity: ≈103,000 residents, ≈178 people per sq mi. About two‑thirds live in Decatur, which has the strongest cable/fiber coverage; outer townships have thinner fixed‑line options.

  • Estimated email users (2024): ≈82,000 residents.

  • Age distribution of email users:

    • 13–17: 6%
    • 18–29: 17%
    • 30–49: 31%
    • 50–64: 22%
    • 65+: 24%
  • Gender split among users: ≈52% female, 48% male (≈43k women, 39k men).

  • Digital access and trends:

    • Household broadband subscription: ≈82% countywide; ≈10–12% have no home internet; ≈15–18% are smartphone‑only.
    • Device access: ≈90% of households have a computer or smartphone; multi‑device use is highest in Decatur.
    • Email adoption: ≈93% of adults use email; seniors 65+ at ≈85–90%.
    • Usage is increasingly mobile, with a majority of email opens occurring on smartphones. Ongoing fiber build‑outs in and around Decatur are raising speeds and reliability, while a persistent rural gap remains in subscription rates and plan quality.

These figures reflect Macon County’s mixed urban–rural profile: high email penetration anchored by Decatur’s connectivity, coupled with lower broadband adoption and more smartphone‑reliant access in outlying areas.

Mobile Phone Usage in Macon County

Mobile phone usage in Macon County, Illinois — 2024 snapshot

Overview

  • Population and households: ~102,000 residents and ~43,000 households. An older age profile and lower median income than the Illinois average shape mobile adoption and reliance patterns.
  • Bottom line: Macon County is broadly connected by mobile, with near-ubiquitous LTE and expanding 5G in and around Decatur. Compared with Illinois as a whole, the county shows slightly lower overall adoption but higher reliance on mobile service as the primary way to get online, especially among lower-income and older residents.

User estimates and adoption

  • Mobile phone ownership (any mobile): ~94–96% of adults, translating to roughly 75,000–78,000 adult mobile users countywide.
  • Smartphone ownership: ~88–91% of adults, or roughly 70,000–73,000 adult smartphone users.
  • Household smartphone penetration: about 89–91% of households report having a smartphone.
  • Household cellular data subscriptions: about 66–70% of households pay for a cellular data plan.
  • Households with no home internet subscription: about 11–13% (higher than the Illinois average).
  • Mobile-only internet reliance (households that rely primarily on cellular/mobile for home internet): meaningfully higher than the state average; commonly seen among renters and lower-income households.

Demographic breakdown (key patterns)

  • Age: Smartphone adoption among adults 65+ trails the state average by several points; younger adults (18–34) are effectively saturated. Older residents are more likely to be mobile-only (smartphone plus cellular data) when they do not maintain a home broadband subscription.
  • Income: Lower-income households are more likely than the county average to rely on a smartphone and a cellular data plan instead of a fixed broadband subscription. This group shows higher usage of prepaid plans.
  • Urban vs. rural: Residents in Decatur and along the I‑72 and US‑51 corridors have stronger 5G availability and faster typical speeds; outlying rural areas are more dependent on LTE or low-band 5G with lower throughput.

Digital infrastructure

  • Networks and coverage:
    • All three national carriers (AT&T, Verizon, T‑Mobile) provide countywide LTE with 5G in and around Decatur and along major corridors.
    • Mid-band 5G (e.g., C‑band/n77 or 2.5 GHz/n41) is concentrated in Decatur and adjacent townships; low-band 5G and LTE serve most rural sectors.
  • Performance patterns:
    • In Decatur and close-in suburbs, typical mid-band 5G download speeds range from low hundreds of Mbps in good signal conditions.
    • Rural areas often fall back to LTE or low-band 5G with typical speeds tens of Mbps, and greater variability indoors or in low-lying terrain.
  • Sites and backhaul:
    • Macro site density is highest in Decatur; additional capacity is added via small cells in commercial zones.
    • Fiber backhaul is available along the I‑72 corridor and within Decatur (incumbent fiber and cable providers), enabling denser 5G deployment in the urban core.
  • Fixed wireless home internet (FWA):
    • 5G home internet from T‑Mobile and Verizon is widely marketed in and around Decatur, filling gaps where cable/fiber adoption is lower. Uptake is above the statewide average due to price sensitivity and uneven wireline coverage in some neighborhoods.

How Macon County differs from Illinois overall

  • Adoption slightly lower, reliance higher:
    • Household smartphone penetration is a couple of points lower than the Illinois average, but the share of households relying primarily on mobile service for home internet is higher.
  • Age and income effects are more pronounced:
    • A larger share of older and lower-income residents depresses overall smartphone and fixed-broadband adoption relative to the state, and increases mobile-only reliance.
  • 5G distribution is more uneven:
    • Compared to major Illinois metros, mid-band 5G coverage is more concentrated in the county seat (Decatur) and along highways, with rural pockets still primarily LTE/low-band 5G.
  • Prepaid and budget plans see greater uptake:
    • Price sensitivity leads to higher use of prepaid and entry-tier plans than the statewide profile, influencing average speeds and data consumption.

Implications

  • Mobile remains the primary on-ramp to the internet for a sizable minority of households, making network capacity and indoor coverage in Decatur especially consequential.
  • Continued buildout of mid-band 5G and expansion of fiber backhaul outside the urban core would narrow performance gaps between Macon County and statewide norms.
  • Programs that subsidize devices and service plans, and that expand fixed broadband options in lower-income neighborhoods, are likely to have outsized impact on digital inclusion locally.

Notes on sources and methodology

  • Figures synthesize the latest available American Community Survey computer-and-internet-use indicators (e.g., S2801), FCC coverage data, and recent national mobile adoption benchmarks applied to local population and household counts. Ranges reflect year-to-year ACS variation and the urban–rural split within the county.

Social Media Trends in Macon County

Social media usage in Macon County, Illinois (best-available, modeled to county scale; sources include U.S. Census Bureau 2023 estimates and Pew Research Center 2023–2024 social media adoption)

Population and user base

  • Residents: about 100,000; median age low 40s; slight female majority (~51%)
  • Estimated social media users: 60,000–70,000 total (roughly 58–66% of the total population), combining adult and teen usage rates

Age groups among users (share of local social users)

  • 13–17: 8–10%
  • 18–24: 10–12%
  • 25–34: 18–20%
  • 35–44: 15–18%
  • 45–54: 16–18%
  • 55–64: 12–14%
  • 65+: 12–15%

Gender breakdown among users

  • Women: ~52%
  • Men: ~48%
  • Women over-index on Facebook, Instagram, Pinterest and local buy/sell groups; men over-index on YouTube, Reddit, and X

Most-used platforms (share of local adult users; aligned to Pew U.S. adoption, adjusted slightly older for the county)

  • YouTube: 80–85%
  • Facebook: 70–75%
  • Instagram: 40–45%
  • TikTok: 28–35%
  • Pinterest: 30–35%
  • LinkedIn: 25–30%
  • Snapchat: 20–25% (skews 13–29)
  • X (Twitter): 18–22%
  • Nextdoor: 10–15% of households

Behavioral trends

  • Facebook as the community hub: heavy use of Groups for schools, churches, youth sports, local news, events, and Marketplace; event posts and lost-and-found see outsized reach
  • Video-first growth: Reels/Shorts/TikTok drive discovery; how-to, home repair, auto, hunting/fishing, and local food content perform well
  • Local trust signals: content from recognizable local figures, schools, and small businesses outperforms generic brand posts; UGC and staff-fronted videos increase engagement
  • Messaging layer is critical: Facebook Messenger and Snapchat are primary share/response channels for younger and midlife users; many sales and RSVPs move to DMs
  • Time-of-day patterns: weekday evenings (7–9 pm) and weekend mornings see the highest engagement; school-year calendars and high school sports schedules create predictable surges
  • Commerce: Facebook/Instagram drive top-of-funnel for local retail, services, and events; Marketplace is a dominant classified channel; short-form video and Stories boost conversion for restaurants and seasonal attractions

Notes on methodology

  • County-level platform counts are not published directly; figures above are derived by applying current U.S. adoption rates by age to Macon County’s population profile and adjusting for the county’s older-leaning age mix
  • For campaign planning or media buying, platform ad reach tools (Facebook/Instagram, TikTok, Snapchat, LinkedIn) provide the latest audience sizes targeted to Macon County boundaries