Tooele County is located in northwestern Utah, west of Salt Lake County, and extends from the metropolitan Wasatch Front into the Great Salt Lake Desert and portions of the Great Basin. Established in 1850 and named for the Tooele Valley, it developed as a regional center for mining, agriculture, and transportation corridors linking Utah with Nevada. The county is mid-sized by Utah standards, with a population of roughly 80,000 residents in recent estimates, concentrated primarily in Tooele, Grantsville, and smaller valley communities. Its landscape includes broad desert basins, mountain ranges such as the Oquirrhs and Stansburys, and significant federally managed lands. The economy combines commuting ties to the Salt Lake City area with local employment in government and defense-related facilities, warehousing, construction, and resource-based activities. The county seat is Tooele.

Tooele County Local Demographic Profile

Tooele County is located in northwestern Utah, immediately west of Salt Lake County, and includes communities along the I‑80 and SR‑36 corridors. The county contains a mix of suburban growth areas (notably Tooele Valley) and large sparsely populated desert and mountain regions.

Population Size

According to the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts for Tooele County, Utah, the county had a population of 79,322 (2020 Census) and an estimated 2023 population of 82,835.

Age & Gender

From the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts:

  • Under 18 years: 28.6%
  • Age 65 and over: 11.7%
  • Female persons: 49.3%
  • Male persons: 50.7% (derived as 100% − female share)

Racial & Ethnic Composition

From the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts (race categories reflect the Census “one race” measures shown on QuickFacts; Hispanic/Latino ethnicity is reported separately and can overlap with race):

  • White alone: 84.7%
  • Black or African American alone: 0.8%
  • American Indian and Alaska Native alone: 1.7%
  • Asian alone: 1.6%
  • Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone: 0.9%
  • Two or more races: 10.2%
  • Hispanic or Latino (of any race): 13.5%

Household & Housing Data

From the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts:

  • Households (2018–2022): 24,672
  • Persons per household (2018–2022): 3.10
  • Owner-occupied housing unit rate (2018–2022): 83.0%
  • Median value of owner-occupied housing units (2018–2022): $369,200
  • Median selected monthly owner costs (with a mortgage, 2018–2022): $1,773
  • Median gross rent (2018–2022): $1,371

For local government and planning resources, visit the Tooele County official website.

Email Usage

Tooele County’s large land area, dispersed settlements, and mountainous/remote terrain contribute to uneven last‑mile infrastructure and a heavier reliance on home broadband and mobile coverage for digital communication, including email.

Direct county-level email usage statistics are not routinely published, so email access is inferred from proxy indicators such as household broadband and computer availability from the U.S. Census Bureau (data.census.gov) and related American Community Survey tables. These measures track the capacity to use email rather than email activity itself.

Broadband subscription and computer access are the primary predictors of routine email access; households lacking either face practical barriers to account setup, authentication, and attachment-heavy communication. Age distribution also influences adoption: older cohorts tend to have lower rates of internet use and online account management than prime working-age adults, affecting email uptake and frequency. Gender distribution is generally less determinative than age and connectivity for basic email access.

Connectivity constraints are shaped by distance from metropolitan networks and limited provider competition in rural areas; county planning and service context is reflected by Tooele County government resources.

Mobile Phone Usage

Tooele County is in northwestern Utah, immediately west and southwest of Salt Lake County. The county includes the city of Tooele and smaller communities (Grantsville, Stansbury Park, Erda) as well as large expanses of sparsely populated desert and mountainous terrain (including the Oquirrh Mountains and areas around the Great Salt Lake Desert). This mix of suburbanizing population centers and very low-density open land is a primary driver of uneven mobile connectivity: coverage is typically strongest along settled corridors and major roads, and weaker in remote basins, mountain areas, and federally managed lands where tower siting and backhaul are more challenging.

Key distinction: network availability vs. household adoption

  • Network availability refers to where mobile carriers report service (coverage) and the technologies advertised (4G LTE, 5G). These are best assessed via provider-coverage datasets and mapping tools published by the Federal Communications Commission and other government programs.
  • Household adoption (use) refers to how residents actually subscribe to and use mobile service (smartphones, mobile broadband, or cellular data as an internet source). In the U.S., adoption is commonly measured by surveys such as the American Community Survey (ACS) for “internet subscription” types or broader broadband adoption surveys; county-level detail may be limited depending on the specific metric.

County context affecting mobile connectivity

  • Population distribution and density: Tooele County’s population is concentrated in and around Tooele City, Grantsville, and the growing Stansbury Park/Erda area, with extensive low-density land elsewhere. County geography and settlement patterns are available via the U.S. Census Bureau and county planning resources (see Census.gov QuickFacts for Tooele County and Tooele County’s official website).
  • Terrain and land use: Mountain ridgelines and broad desert expanses can introduce line-of-sight and backhaul constraints for terrestrial cellular networks. Large tracts of federally managed land and testing/training areas in the region can also affect where infrastructure is feasible.

Mobile penetration or access indicators (availability and adoption)

Network availability indicators (coverage)

  • FCC Broadband Data Collection (BDC): The FCC publishes provider-reported mobile broadband coverage, including technology types, via its National Broadband Map. This is the primary federal reference for availability at fine geographic resolution, but it reflects reported service rather than measured user experience. See the FCC National Broadband Map.
  • Provider coverage claims vs. on-the-ground variability: In counties with mixed terrain and large rural areas, advertised coverage can differ from usable coverage in valleys, canyons, or at the edges of tower footprints. The FCC map supports location-based checks, but it is still a reported dataset rather than a continuous measurement product.

Adoption indicators (household and individual use)

  • ACS “internet subscription” measures: The ACS provides data on household internet subscriptions and can include categories such as cellular data plans, depending on the table and year. These estimates can be used to approximate the share of households relying on cellular data as an internet source, but precision varies by geography and sampling. County-level tables are accessible through data.census.gov.
  • Limitation: Public, county-specific statistics explicitly labeled as “mobile penetration” (mobile subscriptions per 100 people) are generally not published at the county level in the U.S. in the same way they are for countries. County-level adoption must usually be inferred from survey-based household internet measures rather than carrier subscription counts.

Mobile internet usage patterns (4G/5G availability and typical performance considerations)

4G LTE availability

  • General pattern: 4G LTE is typically the baseline mobile broadband layer across most populated parts of Tooele County, with stronger coverage expected along population centers and major transportation corridors.
  • Where to verify: Carrier-by-carrier LTE footprints and the FCC’s availability layers are the standard references (see the FCC National Broadband Map).

5G availability

  • General pattern: 5G availability tends to be concentrated in more populated areas and along high-traffic routes; sparse desert and mountainous areas are more likely to have limited 5G coverage compared with LTE. Provider-reported 5G layers can be viewed via the FCC map.
  • Technology mix: Public maps generally do not standardize the user experience of different 5G implementations (low-band, mid-band, or millimeter wave). County-level, technology-specific performance distributions are typically not published as official statistics.

Actual usage patterns (adoption vs. availability)

  • Mobile as a primary internet connection: In areas with limited fixed broadband options or where housing growth outpaces wireline builds, some households use cellular data plans for home connectivity. The ACS “cellular data plan” subscription category (where available in published tables) is the main county-level indicator accessible through data.census.gov.
  • Limitation: County-level breakdowns of mobile data consumption (GB per user), app usage, or detailed time-of-day patterns are not typically released in official public datasets.

Common device types (smartphones vs. other devices)

  • Smartphones dominate mobile access: Nationally, smartphones are the primary device for mobile internet access, with secondary use of tablets, hotspots, and connected laptops. County-specific device-type shares (smartphone vs. basic phone vs. hotspot-only) are generally not available as a standard public statistic for Tooele County.
  • Proxy indicators: Household survey tables that distinguish device ownership and internet access methods are more commonly published at state or metro levels than at county levels. For Tooele County, the most defensible public proxy remains ACS household internet subscription types via data.census.gov, rather than device counts.

Demographic and geographic factors influencing mobile usage in Tooele County

  • Commuter influence and regional integration: Proximity to the Salt Lake City metro area and commuter flows can increase reliance on mobile connectivity along corridors linking Tooele County to Salt Lake County. Transportation and commuting context can be referenced through Census commuting and community profile products available from the U.S. Census Bureau.
  • Rural–urban split within the county: Residents in or near Tooele City and other established towns typically have more consistent access to both mobile and fixed networks, while residents in outlying unincorporated areas face greater variability in coverage and fewer alternatives when fixed broadband is limited.
  • Topography and distance to infrastructure: Mountainous terrain and large distances between settlements can reduce tower density and complicate backhaul deployment, influencing both the practical usability of mobile networks and the economics of upgrades to newer radio technologies.
  • Growth and housing patterns: Rapid residential development in some parts of Tooele County can create localized demand for mobile capacity and fixed-wireless alternatives, though publicly reported county-level metrics tying growth directly to mobile adoption are limited.

Primary public sources for Tooele County mobile connectivity

Data limitations (explicit)

  • Public, county-level figures for mobile penetration (subscriptions per capita), smartphone share, and mobile data consumption are generally not published as standard official statistics for Tooele County.
  • The most reliable county-level public indicators differentiate availability (FCC/provider-reported coverage) from adoption (ACS household internet subscription categories), but neither provides a complete measure of real-world mobile performance or individual device ownership at the county level.

Social Media Trends

Tooele County sits in northwestern Utah on the western edge of the Salt Lake City metro area. The county includes Tooele and Grantsville and is characterized by suburban growth tied to regional commuting, logistics/industry (including facilities in and around the Great Salt Lake Desert), and outdoor recreation access in the Oquirrh Mountains. These features generally align the county’s social media use with broader U.S. patterns: high smartphone-based usage, platform preferences that vary strongly by age, and heavier daily use among younger adults.

User statistics (penetration / active use)

  • Overall adult usage (proxy): Nationally, ~69% of U.S. adults report using at least one social media site (Pew Research Center). This is the most widely cited benchmark in the absence of county-specific measurement. Source: Pew Research Center: Social Media Fact Sheet.
  • Daily usage (proxy): Social media use is commonly daily among users, with younger adults most likely to report near-constant or multiple-times-per-day use (pattern consistently shown across Pew internet updates). Source: Pew Research Center: Internet & Technology research.
  • Local note (data availability): Public, methodologically consistent county-level “percent active on social platforms” estimates are not routinely published by major survey organizations; county reporting typically relies on modeled ad-audience estimates that vary by platform methodology and are not directly comparable across services.

Age group trends

  • Highest-use age groups: Usage is highest among adults ages 18–29, followed by 30–49; it declines among 50–64 and 65+. Source: Pew Research Center: Social Media Fact Sheet.
  • Platform-by-age pattern (U.S.):
    • YouTube reaches a very broad age range and remains high across most cohorts.
    • Instagram, TikTok, Snapchat skew younger (18–29).
    • Facebook is more evenly distributed but comparatively stronger among 30+ than the newest platforms. Source: Pew Research Center platform detail.
  • County context (interpretation): Tooele County’s mix of family households and commuter communities typically corresponds to strong usage in 30–49 (Facebook/YouTube heavy) alongside high adoption among younger residents (YouTube/Instagram/TikTok), consistent with national age gradients.

Gender breakdown

  • Overall pattern (U.S.): Many platforms show modest gender skews rather than extreme splits, with platform-specific differences (for example, Pinterest tends to skew female, while some discussion/video platforms can skew male depending on measurement). Source: Pew Research Center: Social Media Fact Sheet.
  • County context (interpretation): Tooele County is expected to follow the same general pattern: gender differences are typically smaller than age differences, and platform choice accounts for most observed variation.

Most-used platforms (with percentages where available)

Percentages below reflect U.S. adult usage from Pew as the most reliable, consistently measured benchmark (county-specific platform penetration is not published in the same standardized way).

Behavioral trends (engagement patterns / preferences)

  • Video-centric consumption: YouTube’s broad reach and the rise of short-form video (notably TikTok, Instagram Reels, and YouTube Shorts) align with national engagement shifts toward video-first feeds. Source: Pew Research Center platform use data.
  • Age-driven engagement intensity: Younger adults are more likely to report frequent checking and higher daily time on social apps; older cohorts more commonly use a smaller set of platforms (often Facebook and YouTube). Source: Pew Research Center: Internet & Technology.
  • Community and local-information use: In suburban and exurban counties like Tooele, Facebook Groups/pages and local community accounts commonly function as channels for local events, schools, neighborhood updates, and community discussions, while Instagram/TikTok are more oriented to entertainment and creator content.
  • Professional vs. personal separation: LinkedIn usage is generally concentrated among working-age adults in professional/white-collar roles, while broad household audiences concentrate on YouTube and Facebook. Source: Pew Research Center: LinkedIn usage estimates.

Family & Associates Records

Tooele County family and associate-related public records include vital records, court case files, property records, and marriage/divorce documentation. Birth and death certificates are Utah vital records maintained by the Utah Department of Health and Human Services (UDHHS) Office of Vital Records; local access is commonly provided through the Tooele County Health Department for eligible requesters rather than as open public listings. Adoption records are handled through Utah courts and state vital records systems and are generally sealed, with access restricted by statute and court order.

Publicly searchable databases are typically available for non-vital records. The Tooele County official website provides departmental contact information and access points. Recorded documents such as deeds and liens are maintained by the Tooele County Recorder, with research available through the Recorder’s office and associated indexing tools. Court records, including some family-case docket information (subject to sealing and redaction), are accessed through the Utah Courts Xchange system and in-person at the Third District Court (Tooele).

Privacy restrictions commonly apply to vital records, juvenile matters, adoptions, and sealed family cases; public access may be limited to redacted information or authorized parties.

Marriage & Divorce Records

Types of records available

Marriage records

  • Marriage license and marriage certificate/return: A marriage license is issued by the county clerk prior to the ceremony. After the ceremony, the officiant completes the marriage certificate/return and it is recorded by the clerk, forming the county’s official marriage record.
  • Marriage applications: Supporting application materials may exist as part of the clerk’s licensing file, subject to applicable access rules.

Divorce records

  • Divorce decree: The final judgment dissolving a marriage, issued by the district court. Associated case records commonly include the petition/complaint, summons/returns of service, motions, stipulated agreements, findings of fact/conclusions of law, child custody and support orders, and property/debt division orders.

Annulment records

  • Annulment decree: A district court judgment declaring a marriage void or voidable. The court file typically includes pleadings and orders similar in form to divorce case files.

Where records are filed and how they can be accessed

Marriage records (Tooele County)

  • Filed/recorded with: Tooele County Clerk/Auditor (county level). The county maintains marriage licensing and recorded marriage returns.
  • Access: Requests are made through the Tooele County Clerk/Auditor’s office for certified copies or verification, subject to identification and eligibility requirements under Utah law and county procedures.

Divorce and annulment records (Tooele County)

  • Filed with: Utah District Court, Third District (Tooele County cases are filed within Utah’s Third Judicial District). Divorce and annulment are court proceedings maintained as district court case files.
  • Access:
    • Court clerk access/copies: Copies of decrees and other case documents are obtained through the district court clerk for the case.
    • Online docket access: Many Utah state court case summaries and some documents are available through the Utah courts’ public access systems, subject to classification (public/private/sealed) and document availability. See the Utah State Courts’ public access information: https://www.utcourts.gov/en/self-help/services/records.html.

Statewide vital records (marriage/divorce verification)

  • Utah Office of Vital Records and Statistics maintains statewide vital records functions and issues certain certified copies/verifications under state eligibility rules. See: https://vitalrecords.utah.gov/.

Typical information included in these records

Marriage license/record (county)

Common elements include:

  • Full names of spouses (including maiden name where applicable)
  • Date and place of marriage (ceremony location)
  • Date license issued and license number
  • Officiant name/title and signature; witnesses where required by form
  • Ages or dates of birth (varies by form/version)
  • Places of residence at time of application (varies by form/version)
  • Recording/filing date and clerk certification/seal on certified copies

Divorce decree (district court)

Common elements include:

  • Court name, case number, judge, and decree date
  • Names of the parties
  • Legal dissolution terms (status termination)
  • Orders on property and debt division
  • Spousal support/alimony (when ordered)
  • Child custody (legal/physical), parent-time, and child support (when applicable)
  • Name restoration orders (when requested and granted)
  • Incorporation of settlement agreements or findings

Annulment decree (district court)

Common elements include:

  • Court name, case number, judge, and decree date
  • Names of the parties
  • Determination that the marriage is void/voidable and legal effect
  • Related orders (property/debt, support, custody/parent-time/support where applicable)

Privacy and legal restrictions

Marriage records

  • Marriage records are generally treated as public records for basic certificate information, but access to certified copies and certain application details may be restricted by Utah statute and administrative policy. Identification and eligibility requirements commonly apply for certified copies issued by governmental custodians.

Divorce and annulment records

  • Utah district court records are governed by court record classification rules. Some filings and information may be non-public or sealed, including categories such as:
    • Protected personal identifiers (e.g., Social Security numbers, financial account numbers)
    • Certain juvenile-related or sensitive family law materials, and specific protected documents designated by court rule or order
  • Even when a case exists on a public docket, individual documents may be unavailable online or restricted, and access may require in-person review or a court order depending on classification.

Amendments and sealing

  • Corrections to marriage records are handled through the record custodian and, for some changes, through the state vital records amendment process.
  • Sealing of divorce/annulment records requires a court order under Utah court rules and standards; sealed records are not available to the public absent further court authorization.

Education, Employment and Housing

Tooele County is in northwestern Utah on the west side of the Wasatch Front, bordering Salt Lake County and the Great Salt Lake. The county includes the city of Tooele and fast-growing suburbs and exurbs tied to the Salt Lake City metro area, along with large rural areas, mining and industrial lands, and federal holdings. Recent population estimates place the county in the mid‑70,000s, with growth driven by in‑migration and housing expansion along the SR‑36/I‑80 corridors.

Education Indicators

Public schools (counts and names)

Public K–12 education is primarily served by Tooele County School District (TCSD). The district’s school list and directory are published by the district on its official site (school-by-school names and contacts): Tooele County School District.
A consolidated, official statewide directory of public schools (including charters) is also maintained by the Utah State Board of Education: Utah State Board of Education.

Data note: A single authoritative “number of public schools” varies slightly by year due to openings/grade reconfigurations and inclusion of charter schools. The most reliable approach is the current TCSD directory for district-run schools and the USBE directory for the full countywide public-school universe.

Student–teacher ratios and graduation rates

  • Student–teacher ratio: County and district ratios are commonly reported through federal school datasets (NCES) and state report cards, but the latest ratio value can differ by reporting year and whether it is calculated using FTE staff. The most consistent source for district-level ratios and staffing is the NCES district profile for Tooele County School District: National Center for Education Statistics (NCES).
  • Graduation rates: Utah publishes cohort graduation rates through state reporting. The most current district and high-school graduation outcomes are reported via Utah’s school accountability/report card tools: Utah School Report Cards.

Data note: This summary avoids quoting specific ratios or graduation percentages without a pinned reporting year because TCSD and school-level values change annually and are reported in multiple official formats (district, school, subgroup).

Adult educational attainment (countywide)

The most recent comprehensive county estimates are available through the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS). Key indicators commonly cited for Tooele County include:

  • High school diploma or higher (age 25+): reported in ACS county tables
  • Bachelor’s degree or higher (age 25+): reported in ACS county tables

County educational attainment can be referenced using ACS QuickFacts for Tooele County: U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts: Tooele County, Utah.

Notable programs (STEM, CTE, AP)

  • Career and Technical Education (CTE): Utah districts, including TCSD, participate in statewide CTE pathways aligned to industry credentials and concurrent enrollment structures. Statewide program framing and approved pathways are documented by USBE CTE: Utah CTE.
  • Advanced Placement (AP) / concurrent enrollment: AP access and participation are typically offered through high schools, while concurrent enrollment is widely used in Utah through partnerships with higher education. Utah’s concurrent enrollment framework is documented by USBE: Utah Concurrent Enrollment.
  • STEM offerings: STEM programming is commonly delivered through course sequences (math/science/engineering, computer science) and CTE clusters rather than a single countywide “STEM academy.” School-level catalogs and CTE pathway listings provide the most accurate inventory.

School safety measures and counseling resources

  • Safety planning: Utah requires school safety planning and reporting structures; district and school emergency procedures, drills, and threat assessment practices are aligned with state guidance. State-level safety resources are maintained by USBE: Utah school safety resources.
  • Student supports (counseling/mental health): Counseling services are typically provided through school counselors, social workers, and partnerships, with statewide coordination and guidance reflected in USBE student services resources: Utah student services. Utah’s broader youth mental-health supports and crisis resources are also coordinated through state and local providers.

Employment and Economic Conditions

Unemployment rate (most recent year)

The most authoritative local unemployment statistics are produced by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (LAUS) and published for counties through state labor market information portals. Tooele County’s most recent annual and monthly unemployment rates are available via:

Data note: The county’s unemployment rate generally tracks the Wasatch Front labor market and has remained low in recent years by historical standards, with short-term variation tied to construction cycles, commuting flows, and broader state trends.

Major industries and employment sectors

Employment in Tooele County reflects a mix of:

  • Government and defense-related activity (notably near the county’s major federal installations and support services)
  • Manufacturing and logistics/warehousing (tied to interstates and regional distribution)
  • Mining and materials (including extraction and processing activities in the county)
  • Construction (supported by rapid residential development)
  • Retail and services (local-serving employment concentrated in Tooele and growing communities)

Sector composition and leading industries can be verified using county industry tables from Utah’s labor market information products: Utah workforce data.

Common occupations and workforce breakdown

Typical high-employment occupational groups for the county mirror metro-area patterns with relatively strong shares in:

  • Transportation and material moving
  • Construction and extraction
  • Production occupations
  • Office/administrative support
  • Sales and service roles
  • Management and professional roles (often tied to commuting to Salt Lake County)

Occupational employment patterns are published through state workforce analytics and federal occupational data products (state and metro proxies are sometimes used when county sample sizes are limited): BLS occupational employment data.

Commuting patterns and mean commute time

  • Commuting pattern: Tooele County functions as a commuter-linked county to Salt Lake County, with substantial daily flows eastbound via SR‑36 and I‑80 corridors.
  • Mean travel time to work: The county’s mean commute time is reported through ACS commuting tables and QuickFacts: ACS commuting indicators for Tooele County.

Proxy note: Where a single “typical” commute time is needed for narrative use, ACS mean travel time is the standard benchmark, while corridor peak travel times can be longer than the mean due to congestion and incident variability.

Local employment versus out-of-county work

A significant share of employed residents work outside the county, particularly in Salt Lake County, reflecting housing growth and metro job concentrations. The best public sources for residence-to-work flows include:

Housing and Real Estate

Homeownership and rental share

Homeownership and renter shares for Tooele County are reported through ACS housing tables and QuickFacts:

Countywide, the housing stock is dominated by owner-occupied single-family units relative to large urban counties, with renter shares concentrated near city centers and multifamily developments.

Median property values and recent trends

  • Median owner-occupied home value: reported via ACS and QuickFacts (county median value, inflation-adjusted by survey year): Median value of owner-occupied housing units
  • Recent trends: Tooele County experienced rapid price appreciation during the 2020–2022 period consistent with Wasatch Front dynamics, followed by a cooler market with higher interest rates. For transaction-based trend context (not ACS), Utah housing market indicators are often summarized by statewide housing analytics and MLS-based reporting; ACS remains the standard for comparable county medians.

Data note: ACS median value is a survey-based estimate and typically lags real-time market shifts; it is useful for year-to-year comparability rather than current listing conditions.

Typical rent prices

Rents tend to be lower than core Salt Lake County but have risen alongside regional demand and limited multifamily supply in parts of the county.

Housing types and development pattern

  • Single-family detached homes are the dominant form, especially in newer subdivisions in communities such as Tooele, Stansbury Park, and Grantsville.
  • Townhomes and small multifamily are increasing in growing nodes, typically near arterial roads and commercial services.
  • Rural lots and agricultural-residential parcels remain common outside the main population centers, with larger setbacks and greater reliance on personal vehicles.

Housing unit mix can be cross-checked using ACS structure type tables for Tooele County: ACS housing structure data (data.census.gov).

Neighborhood characteristics (schools/amenities proximity)

  • Tooele City and Grantsville provide the highest concentration of schools, grocery/retail, clinics, and civic services.
  • Stansbury Park and Lake Point areas reflect master-planned and suburban-style neighborhoods with access to schools and parks, and commuter access toward Salt Lake County.
  • More rural areas typically feature longer travel distances to schools and services and fewer sidewalks/transit options.

Proxy note: Neighborhood-level walkability and amenity proximity are not uniformly published as county administrative statistics; municipal plans and regional transportation plans provide the most direct documentation.

Property tax overview (rate and typical homeowner cost)

Property taxes in Utah are levied by overlapping local taxing entities (county, municipalities, school districts, special districts) and vary by location and taxable value. The most reliable county-specific property tax and assessed value information is published by:

Proxy note: A single “average rate” is not a stable countywide figure because effective tax rates vary materially by municipality, special districts, and valuation changes. Utah’s effective property tax burden is generally moderate by national standards, with homeowner totals primarily driven by assessed value and local taxing jurisdiction combinations within Tooele County.

Table of Contents

Other Counties in Utah