Forest County is a small, predominantly rural county in northwestern Pennsylvania, located within the Allegheny Plateau and bordering the Allegheny National Forest region. Created in 1848 from parts of Jefferson County, it developed around the area’s extensive hardwood forests and became closely associated with the 19th-century lumber boom and subsequent resource-based industries. Today, Forest County has one of the smallest populations in the state—roughly in the four- to five-thousand range—reflecting its low-density settlement pattern and limited urban development. The landscape is characterized by heavily wooded hills, river valleys, and public lands that shape local land use and recreation. Economic activity has historically centered on timber, related manufacturing, and services connected to natural-resource management, with many communities remaining small and dispersed. The county seat is Tionesta, a borough situated along the Allegheny River.

Forest County Local Demographic Profile

Forest County is a rural county in northwestern Pennsylvania within the Pennsylvania Wilds region, bordered by the Allegheny National Forest area. It is one of the least-populous counties in the state by resident population.

Population Size

According to the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts for Forest County, Pennsylvania, the county had:

  • Population (2020): 7,537
  • Population (2023 estimate): 7,101

For local government context and county-level public information, visit the Forest County official website.

Age & Gender

According to U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts (most recent profile values available on the page):

  • Age distribution (selected):
    • Under 18 years: 16.6%
    • Age 65 years and over: 25.9%
  • Gender ratio (sex composition):
    • Female persons: 46.4%
    • Male persons: 53.6% (calculated as the remainder to 100%)

Racial & Ethnic Composition

According to U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts (race and Hispanic/Latino ethnicity reported separately):

  • Race (alone):
    • White: 95.9%
    • Black or African American: 0.6%
    • American Indian and Alaska Native: 0.2%
    • Asian: 0.3%
    • Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander: 0.0%
    • Two or more races: 3.0%
  • Ethnicity:
    • Hispanic or Latino: 0.8%

Household & Housing Data

According to U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts:

  • Households (2019–2023): 3,183
  • Persons per household (2019–2023): 2.11
  • Owner-occupied housing unit rate (2019–2023): 81.5%
  • Median value of owner-occupied housing units (2019–2023, in 2023 dollars): $134,600
  • Median gross rent (2019–2023, in 2023 dollars): $708
  • Housing units (2023): 6,153
  • Homeownership rate: Reported as the owner-occupied housing unit rate above (81.5%).

Email Usage

Forest County, Pennsylvania is a sparsely populated, heavily wooded rural county where long distances between homes and limited last‑mile infrastructure can constrain reliable internet access, affecting routine digital communication such as email.

Direct county-level email usage statistics are not typically published; email adoption is therefore inferred from digital-access proxies. In the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey, key indicators for Forest County include household broadband subscription and access to a computer (desktop/laptop/tablet), which track the practical ability to maintain email accounts and use webmail securely. Age structure also influences email uptake: older populations tend to have lower adoption of some online services and may rely more on in-person or telephone communication, while working-age residents more often need email for employment, schooling, health portals, and government services. Sex (gender) composition is generally less predictive of email use than access and age, and is mainly relevant for interpreting household technology adoption patterns alongside age.

Connectivity constraints in rural northwestern Pennsylvania commonly include limited provider choice, terrain/forest-related line-of-sight challenges, and gaps in high-speed coverage documented in FCC broadband availability data and planning resources linked by Forest County government.

Mobile Phone Usage

Forest County is a sparsely populated, heavily forested county in northwestern Pennsylvania, anchored by the Allegheny National Forest and characterized by rugged terrain, extensive public lands, and small boroughs separated by large rural areas. These features generally increase the cost and complexity of building dense cellular infrastructure and can create localized coverage gaps (for example, in valleys, remote forested areas, and along less-traveled roads), even when statewide coverage maps show broad service areas.

County context relevant to mobile connectivity

  • Rurality and population density: Forest County is among Pennsylvania’s least-densely populated counties, which typically reduces commercial incentives for dense tower placement and speeds of technology upgrades.
  • Terrain and land cover: Forested and hilly terrain can attenuate signal and limit effective coverage radius, particularly for higher-frequency bands used in some 5G deployments.
  • Settlement pattern: Small population centers (e.g., Tionesta area) tend to have stronger multi-carrier service than remote townships and forest lands.

Primary reference sources for county context and population: U.S. Census Bureau (Census.gov) and USDA rural definitions and context (Rural.gov).

Network availability (coverage) vs. adoption (use)

Mobile connectivity in a county is best described by separating:

  • Network availability: where carriers report that service exists (4G/5G coverage footprints).
  • Household adoption and usage: whether residents subscribe to mobile service and use mobile broadband, and whether mobile substitutes for home internet.

These measures do not move in lockstep: areas may have reported 4G/5G coverage but low adoption due to cost, device constraints, or preference for fixed connections; conversely, households may rely on mobile even where fixed broadband is limited.

Network availability in Forest County (reported coverage)

4G LTE availability

  • Reported LTE coverage is generally widespread along primary roads and in/near population centers, with higher likelihood of weaker or inconsistent service in remote forested areas.
  • The most widely used public, address-level and map-based reference for reported mobile coverage is the FCC’s Broadband Data Collection (BDC) and associated maps.

Authoritative sources:

Limitations to note:

  • FCC mobile availability is based on provider-reported coverage and standardized methodologies; it describes where a provider claims a minimum service level, not guaranteed in-building performance everywhere. Local topography and tree cover can materially affect real-world experience.

5G availability

  • 5G availability is typically more limited than LTE in rural counties, with the most consistent 5G service generally concentrated near town centers and along higher-traffic corridors.
  • In rural areas, much of what is labeled “5G” can be low-band 5G, which emphasizes coverage over large speed increases relative to LTE. Higher-frequency 5G layers (often associated with very high speeds) are less common outside denser areas due to shorter range and greater sensitivity to obstructions.

Authoritative sources:

County-level limitation:

  • Publicly available sources commonly show coverage footprints, but do not reliably publish county-specific, carrier-by-carrier performance statistics (such as median mobile download speeds) at a level that cleanly isolates Forest County without third-party datasets.

Household adoption and access indicators (what residents actually use)

Mobile subscription and “mobile-only” reliance

County-specific mobile subscription rates are not consistently published as a single “mobile penetration” figure at the county level in public federal datasets. However, several U.S. Census Bureau products describe how households connect to the internet, including households that are cellular data plan–only (mobile-only) for internet access.

Authoritative sources:

Interpretation guidance (non-speculative):

  • ACS internet subscription tables can distinguish households with cellular data plan only versus those with cable, fiber, DSL, satellite, or other subscriptions. This provides a direct indicator of mobile broadband dependence in the household.
  • Small-population counties can have larger margins of error in ACS estimates, which is important for Forest County given its low population.

Device access indicators

County-level public datasets often address “computer” versus “internet subscription” more than detailed device inventories. The ACS can indicate whether a household has a smartphone and/or other computing devices used to access the internet, depending on table availability in the chosen year and release.

Authoritative sources:

Limitation:

  • Public sources generally do not provide a single, definitive county-level breakdown of smartphone models or operating systems; such details typically come from private market research.

Mobile internet usage patterns (practical implications in rural counties)

Typical usage patterns associated with LTE-first areas

Where LTE is the dominant layer:

  • Streaming and video calling are feasible in many covered areas but may vary by location (especially indoors and in remote terrain).
  • Congestion sensitivity can be higher in areas with fewer cell sites serving broad geographies.

Typical usage patterns where 5G is present

Where 5G is available:

  • Low-band 5G often improves coverage consistency more than peak speeds compared with LTE.
  • Higher-capacity 5G layers, where present, tend to be geographically limited and are less typical of heavily rural landscapes.

Data limitation:

  • Public sources at the county level more reliably describe availability than actual usage intensity (hours streamed, app usage, etc.). Those behavioral measures are generally not published as official county statistics.

Common device types (smartphones vs. other devices)

  • Smartphones are the primary mobile access device for cellular networks in U.S. households, and they are the most directly measured “mobile” device category in federal survey instruments.
  • Hotspots and fixed wireless receivers can play a role in rural broadband strategies, but these are usually reported under internet subscription types rather than detailed device counts in publicly accessible county tables.

Best public sources for device-related indicators:

Demographic and geographic factors influencing mobile usage in Forest County

Geography and land use

  • Large forested areas and variable topography can reduce signal reliability and increase the need for towers sited on ridgelines or near corridors, influencing where service is strongest.
  • Public land concentration can affect infrastructure siting timelines and costs (permitting, environmental review), which can influence the pace of upgrades.

Rural household connectivity choices

  • Rural counties often show a mix of:
    • households using mobile plans as their primary internet where fixed options are limited or costly,
    • households using mobile primarily for voice and supplemental data where fixed broadband exists.

County-level limitation:

  • The exact balance between “mobile-only” and “fixed-plus-mobile” households in Forest County is best obtained from ACS internet subscription tables, and those estimates can carry higher uncertainty due to small sample sizes.

Income, age, and disability status (measured in ACS)

Nationally and statewide, mobile-only reliance tends to be associated with affordability constraints and varies by age and household composition; county-level confirmation requires ACS tables filtered to Forest County. Authoritative source:

Local and state planning context

Data limitations specific to Forest County

  • No single public “mobile penetration” metric is consistently published at the county level in a way that cleanly represents all carriers and plan types.
  • Coverage (availability) maps are not the same as adoption and do not guarantee in-building performance or continuous service in heavily forested or rugged areas.
  • Survey-based adoption estimates (ACS) can have notable margins of error in very low-population counties, requiring careful use of confidence intervals when citing specific percentages.

Social Media Trends

Forest County is a sparsely populated, heavily forested county in northwestern Pennsylvania, anchored by the small borough of Tionesta and shaped by outdoor recreation (including the Allegheny National Forest region) and a rural settlement pattern. Its low population density and older-than-average age structure relative to large metro areas generally correspond with lower overall social media adoption and heavier reliance on mobile connectivity for access.

User statistics (penetration and active use)

  • Local, county-specific “% active on social media” figures are not published in standard federal datasets; public measurement is typically available at the national or state level rather than at the county level.
  • National benchmarks commonly used to contextualize rural counties:
    • United States (adults): about 69% of U.S. adults report using at least one social media site (Pew Research Center). Source: Pew Research Center social media fact sheet.
    • Internet access (a key constraint in rural areas): rural broadband availability and adoption patterns are tracked by federal sources such as the FCC National Broadband Map, which is often used to evaluate connectivity constraints that can reduce social platform penetration in rural counties.

Age group trends

National survey patterns (commonly applied as directional guidance for rural counties in the absence of county-level surveys):

  • Highest use: ages 18–29 are consistently the most likely to use social platforms across major surveys.
  • Moderate use: ages 30–49 typically show high but lower adoption than 18–29.
  • Lower use: ages 50–64 are lower still, and 65+ remains the least likely cohort to use many platforms (though usage has risen over time).
  • Source for age-by-platform detail: Pew Research Center (age breakdowns by platform).

Gender breakdown

  • Nationally, women tend to report higher usage than men on several platforms (notably Pinterest and, in many surveys, Facebook and Instagram), while men tend to be more prevalent on Reddit and some discussion- or interest-led communities.
  • Platform-specific gender splits are documented in: Pew Research Center social media fact sheet (gender by platform).

Most-used platforms (share of U.S. adults; commonly used as a baseline)

Pew Research Center’s recent national estimates (U.S. adults) commonly cited as baseline platform reach:

  • YouTube: ~83%
  • Facebook: ~68%
  • Instagram: ~47%
  • Pinterest: ~35%
  • TikTok: ~33%
  • LinkedIn: ~30%
  • X (formerly Twitter): ~22%
  • Snapchat: ~27%
  • WhatsApp: ~29%
  • Reddit: ~22%
    Source: Pew Research Center platform usage estimates.
    Note: county-level platform shares are generally not published; rural counties often skew toward platforms with broad, older-user reach (notably Facebook and YouTube) due to local community groups and general entertainment/video use.

Behavioral trends (engagement patterns and preferences)

  • Community information utility: In rural counties, social media use often centers on practical local information (community announcements, school and municipal updates, events, weather impacts), which aligns with Facebook’s group and page ecosystem and YouTube for how-to/outdoor content.
  • Video-first consumption: Nationally, YouTube’s reach exceeds all other platforms among adults, supporting heavy video consumption patterns even where other platform adoption varies. Source: Pew Research Center (YouTube reach).
  • Age-driven platform choice:
    • Younger adults disproportionately drive Instagram, TikTok, Snapchat usage.
    • Older adults concentrate more on Facebook (and increasingly YouTube for entertainment/information). Source: Pew Research Center (platform use by age).
  • Messaging and private sharing: Surveys show substantial use of private or semi-private sharing via messaging features and group spaces (e.g., Facebook Groups, WhatsApp), reflecting a broader shift from public posting to smaller-audience interaction in many communities. Reference context: Pew Research Center internet and technology research.

Family & Associates Records

Forest County does not typically maintain local “vital records” (birth and death certificates) at the county level. In Pennsylvania, certified birth and death certificates are issued by the Pennsylvania Department of Health, Division of Vital Records, with ordering and eligibility rules published through PA Department of Health — Vital Records. Delayed registrations and historical indexes may be available through state archives resources rather than county offices.

Marriage and divorce-related records are generally handled through the county court system. Forest County marriage license records are issued and recorded by the Forest County Register & Recorder (marriage licenses) and domestic relations/court filings are maintained by the Forest County Court of Common Pleas/Prothonotary.

Adoption records in Pennsylvania are not public; they are typically sealed and maintained through the courts and state agencies. Access is restricted by statute and court order processes, with general guidance published by the Commonwealth.

Public databases: county-level online search tools for family-status records are limited. Statewide docket access for many court cases is available through Pennsylvania Unified Judicial System Web Portal, which includes access limits for protected case types.

Access: records are obtained in person at the relevant county office in Tionesta or via state online/mail ordering for vital records. Privacy restrictions apply to certified vital records, adoption files, and certain family-court matters.

Marriage & Divorce Records

Types of records maintained

  • Marriage license records (and returns/certificates)
    Forest County maintains records of marriage license applications, the issued license, and the marriage return (the officiant’s certification returned to the issuing office after the ceremony). Pennsylvania does not create a single statewide “marriage certificate” at the state level; the county marriage license record functions as the primary legal record of the marriage.

  • Divorce records (decrees and case dockets)
    Divorce decrees and the associated civil case file (pleadings, orders, docket entries, and related filings) are maintained by the Forest County Court of Common Pleas.

  • Annulment records (decrees and case files)
    Annulments are handled as court matters in the Court of Common Pleas; the resulting orders/decrees and case files are maintained in the same court record system as other domestic relations civil matters.

Where records are filed and how they are accessed

  • Marriage records (Forest County Register of Wills / Clerk of Orphans’ Court)
    In Pennsylvania, marriage licenses are issued and recorded at the county level by the office commonly titled Register of Wills / Clerk of Orphans’ Court (the title and office organization can vary by county). Forest County marriage license records are filed and retained by that office.
    Access is typically provided through:

    • In-person requests at the county office during business hours
    • Written requests for certified copies, subject to county procedures and fees
      County-specific procedures and contact information are published on the county’s official website: https://forestcountypa.gov/.

  • Divorce and annulment records (Forest County Court of Common Pleas / Prothonotary)
    Divorce and annulment case filings and decrees are filed in the Court of Common Pleas and maintained by the Prothonotary/Clerk of Courts function for civil case records (office naming can vary by county).
    Access is typically provided through:

    • In-person review of public docket information and paper/electronic files at the courthouse
    • Certified copies of decrees or orders requested through the court record office, subject to fees and identification requirements set by the court
      Pennsylvania’s statewide court docket portal can provide docket access for many counties and case types: https://ujsportal.pacourts.us/.

Typical information included

  • Marriage license records

    • Full legal names of applicants (and sometimes prior names)
    • Ages and/or dates of birth
    • Residences/addresses and places of birth
    • Marital status at time of application (e.g., single/divorced/widowed)
    • Date of application, date of issuance, and license number
    • Officiant name/title and date/place of ceremony (recorded on the return)
    • Signatures and attestations required by Pennsylvania marriage licensing practice

  • Divorce case files and decrees

    • Names of parties, case caption, docket number, county of filing
    • Dates of filing, service, hearings, and decree entry
    • Grounds/statutory basis reflected in filings (as applicable under Pennsylvania practice)
    • Orders addressing legal status of the marriage; may also include related orders or agreements filed in the case
    • Associated filings may reference property distribution, custody, support, and related matters, though some related proceedings may be docketed separately or contain restricted information

  • Annulment orders/decrees and files

    • Names of parties and docket information
    • Court findings and the legal basis for annulment
    • Entry date of the decree/order and related procedural filings

Privacy and legal restrictions

  • Marriage records

    • Marriage license records are generally treated as public records at the county level, with certified copies issued per county policy and Pennsylvania recordkeeping practice.
    • Certain personal identifiers (for example, Social Security numbers) are generally not included in publicly released copies or may be redacted under court and privacy rules.

  • Divorce and annulment records

    • Docket information and final decrees are generally public court records unless sealed.
    • Sealing, redaction, and restricted access can apply to specific filings or exhibits by court order, and to sensitive information governed by Pennsylvania’s public access and confidentiality rules for the Unified Judicial System.
    • Children’s information and certain domestic relations-related documents may be subject to heightened confidentiality or redaction standards in court records compared with basic docket entries and decrees.

Education, Employment and Housing

Forest County is a small, heavily forested rural county in northwestern Pennsylvania, anchored by the borough of Tionesta and surrounded by Allegheny National Forest lands. The county has one of Pennsylvania’s smallest populations and a comparatively older age profile, with community life and services concentrated in a limited number of small towns and unincorporated areas. Public services, employment opportunities, and housing markets reflect low density, long travel distances, and a reliance on nearby counties for specialized jobs, healthcare, and retail.

Education Indicators

Public schools (number and names)

Forest County is served by a single public school district: Forest Area School District (district-wide campus model).

  • Forest Area Elementary School
  • West Forest Junior–Senior High School
    School and district profiles are maintained through the Pennsylvania Department of Education (PDE) in its public district/school directories and performance reporting tools (for directory and profiles, see the Pennsylvania Department of Education and its linked district/school information systems).

Student–teacher ratios and graduation outcomes

  • Student–teacher ratio: Forest County’s district-level ratio is typically reported in the low teens (students per teacher) in recent years, reflecting small enrollment and rural staffing patterns. Exact ratios vary by year and reporting method (district vs. school-level FTE counts) and are best verified in the most recent PDE district profile.
  • Graduation rate: The county’s graduation outcomes are reported at the high-school/district level through PDE’s graduation rate reporting. In small cohorts, annual graduation rates can fluctuate materially year to year due to the small number of students; PDE’s multi-year reporting provides the most stable picture. (Primary source: PDE Data and Reporting.)

Adult educational attainment (county-level)

Forest County’s adult educational attainment is best represented by the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS) county estimates:

  • High school diploma (or equivalent), age 25+: commonly reported as a clear majority of adults (typical rural Pennsylvania pattern is roughly mid‑80% to ~90%+ with at least a high school credential, with year-to-year sampling variation in small counties).
  • Bachelor’s degree or higher, age 25+: typically below Pennsylvania’s statewide average, reflecting a rural labor market and limited local higher-education institutions.
    Source for attainment tables: U.S. Census Bureau data.census.gov (ACS Educational Attainment tables for Forest County, PA).

Notable programs (STEM, CTE/vocational, AP/dual enrollment)

  • Career and Technical Education (CTE): Rural Pennsylvania districts commonly participate in regional CTE offerings through shared services or career-technical centers; Forest County students may access vocational pathways through regional arrangements reported in district planning documents and PDE CTE materials.
  • Advanced coursework (AP/dual enrollment): Small rural high schools often provide a limited set of AP courses and more frequently use dual-enrollment or online coursework to expand offerings; availability is program- and year-specific and is typically documented in district course catalogs and PDE school profiles.
  • STEM enrichment: STEM offerings in rural districts are generally integrated through standard science/math sequences, project-based learning, and statewide initiatives rather than large specialized academies; district and intermediate unit programming are the most common delivery models.

School safety measures and counseling resources

Pennsylvania public schools operate under statewide requirements for:

  • Emergency preparedness and safety planning (building-level safety plans, drills, and coordination with local emergency management).
  • Student services including school counseling and student assistance supports (often delivered through a combination of school counselors, school psychologists, and contracted/community providers in smaller districts).
    Authoritative statewide framework and guidance: PDE Safe Schools.

Employment and Economic Conditions

Unemployment rate (most recent available)

Forest County unemployment is tracked monthly by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Local Area Unemployment Statistics.

  • The most recent annual average unemployment rate is reported by BLS and is the standard reference for “most recent year available.”
    Primary source: BLS Local Area Unemployment Statistics.
    Note: In small counties, unemployment rates can be more volatile and seasonally influenced; annual averages provide the most comparable measure.

Major industries and employment sectors

Forest County’s employment base reflects a rural/forest economy and a small-town service structure. The largest sectors commonly include:

  • Health care and social assistance
  • Retail trade
  • Educational services (public sector)
  • Manufacturing (often small facilities regionally; county totals can be modest)
  • Public administration
  • Accommodation/food services and tourism-related activity (influenced by nearby recreation lands)
  • Natural resources and construction (forestry-related activity and trades)
    County sector composition is available through ACS industry tables and regional economic datasets (ACS source: data.census.gov).

Common occupations and workforce breakdown

Typical occupational group concentrations in Forest County align with rural Pennsylvania patterns:

  • Office/administrative support
  • Sales and related occupations
  • Healthcare support and practitioner roles
  • Transportation and material moving
  • Production and maintenance occupations
  • Construction and extraction (smaller absolute counts, but comparatively important)
    Occupational breakdowns are available via ACS “Occupation” tables for county of residence (source: data.census.gov).

Commuting patterns and mean commute times

  • Mode: High reliance on driving alone, limited fixed-route transit, and some carpooling, consistent with low-density settlement.
  • Mean commute time: Typically in the mid‑20s to low‑30s minutes range for rural northwestern Pennsylvania counties; Forest County’s mean is best taken from the latest ACS “Travel Time to Work” measures (source: ACS commuting tables on data.census.gov).

Local employment vs. out-of-county work

  • A substantial share of residents commonly work outside the county due to the limited number of large employers and specialized jobs locally. This is characteristic of very small counties where employment centers are located in adjacent counties. The resident-workplace geography can be quantified through Census commuting flow products and ACS “place of work” indicators (Census commuting resources: U.S. Census LEHD/OnTheMap).

Housing and Real Estate

Homeownership rate and rental share

  • Forest County generally has a majority owner-occupied housing stock, typical of rural Pennsylvania, with a smaller rental market concentrated in borough settings and near employment nodes.
    The most current owner/renter split is reported in ACS tenure tables (source: ACS Housing Tenure on data.census.gov).

Median property values and recent trends

  • Median home value: Forest County’s median owner-occupied home value is typically well below the Pennsylvania statewide median, reflecting rural demand, housing age, and limited market turnover.
  • Trend: Recent years have generally followed broader U.S. and Pennsylvania patterns of price appreciation from 2020–2024, but with lower absolute price levels and fewer sales, which can make medians more sensitive to a small number of transactions.
    ACS median value is available via data.census.gov; transaction-based trend context is often summarized in county-level market reports from state or regional realtor associations (transaction datasets vary and are not uniform across sources).

Typical rent prices

  • Rents are typically lower than Pennsylvania metro-area rents, with limited apartment inventory. The best countywide benchmark is ACS median gross rent, which captures contract rent plus estimated utilities (source: ACS Gross Rent on data.census.gov).

Types of housing

  • Single-family detached homes dominate, including older housing stock in boroughs and dispersed homes on rural roads.
  • Manufactured homes and small multi-unit buildings are present but generally a smaller share than in urban counties.
  • Rural lots and seasonal/recreational-adjacent properties are a notable component due to proximity to large forest and outdoor recreation areas.

Neighborhood characteristics (proximity to schools/amenities)

  • Tionesta and other small communities provide the highest proximity to core amenities (schools, local government services, small retail).
  • Outlying areas offer larger parcels and greater privacy but require longer travel times to schools, healthcare, and groceries; school bus travel distances are commonly longer than in more urban counties.

Property tax overview (rate and typical homeowner cost)

  • Pennsylvania property taxes are levied primarily at the school district, county, and municipal levels; effective rates vary by locality and reassessment history. Forest County homeowners typically face:
    • A school-tax-dominant property tax structure (common statewide)
    • Total bills that can be moderate in dollars due to lower assessed values, even when millage rates are not low
      Comparable county property tax and effective-rate summaries are published by sources such as the Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development (for local government context) and aggregated tax/statistical profiles; the most authoritative figures for an individual parcel come from county assessment and school district tax notices.

Data availability note: For several indicators above (notably student–teacher ratios, graduation rates, and detailed program inventories), the most precise, current values are maintained in Pennsylvania Department of Education school/district profiles and annual reporting releases; Forest County’s small cohort sizes can cause year-to-year volatility in education outcome percentages and ACS sampling uncertainty in some county estimates.

Table of Contents

Other Counties in Pennsylvania