Treasure County is a sparsely populated county in southeastern Montana, situated along the Yellowstone River corridor east of Billings and bordering Rosebud County. Created in 1919 from parts of Rosebud County, it developed around dryland farming and livestock ranching in the Northern Great Plains. Treasure County is small in scale, with a population of roughly 700 residents, making it one of Montana’s least populous counties. The landscape includes broad prairie, river breaks, and irrigated bottomlands near the Yellowstone, with agriculture remaining the dominant economic activity and oil and gas development present in the wider region. Settlement patterns are rural, with limited services and few incorporated places. Community life is closely tied to ranching, agricultural production, and regional trade connections to larger nearby towns. The county seat is Hysham, located on the Yellowstone River and serving as the primary administrative and service center.

Treasure County Local Demographic Profile

Treasure County is a sparsely populated county in southeastern Montana, along the Yellowstone River corridor. It is located east of Billings and is part of the broader Yellowstone Valley region of the state.

Population Size

According to the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts for Treasure County, Montana, Treasure County had a population of 718 at the 2020 Census.

Age & Gender

County-level age distribution and sex composition figures are published by the U.S. Census Bureau through the American Community Survey (ACS). The most direct consolidated tables for Treasure County are available via data.census.gov (search “Treasure County, Montana” and the topics “Age and Sex” for ACS tables).
Exact age-group shares and male/female percentages are not provided in this response because the requested county-level breakdowns were not retrieved from a specific published table within the sources cited above.

Racial & Ethnic Composition

Race and Hispanic/Latino origin for Treasure County are reported by the U.S. Census Bureau. A county summary is available in QuickFacts (Treasure County, Montana), and detailed race/ethnicity tables are available on data.census.gov.
Exact category percentages are not provided in this response because the detailed county-level composition values were not retrieved from a specific published table within the sources cited above.

Household & Housing Data

Household and housing characteristics (including number of households, average household size, occupancy/vacancy, and owner/renter patterns) are published for Treasure County by the U.S. Census Bureau in ACS and decennial products. Summary indicators appear in QuickFacts for Treasure County, and more detailed tables are available through data.census.gov under “Housing” and “Families and Living Arrangements.”
Exact household totals and housing-unit measures are not provided in this response because the specific county-level figures were not retrieved from a cited table within the sources named above.

Local Government Reference

For local government and planning resources, visit the Treasure County official website.

Email Usage

Treasure County, Montana is a sparsely populated rural county where long distances and limited last‑mile infrastructure can constrain reliable internet access, shaping how residents use email for communication.

Direct county-level email-usage statistics are not typically published; broadband and device access are used as proxies because email generally requires an internet connection and a capable device. The most consistent local indicators come from the U.S. Census Bureau (American Community Survey), which reports household broadband subscription and computer ownership measures that track the practical ability to access email. In rural counties, gaps in fixed broadband availability and speed can shift access toward mobile connections and reduce consistency of email use, especially for large attachments or multi-factor authentication.

Age structure also influences likely email adoption: older populations tend to have lower overall internet use than working-age adults, affecting routine email engagement. County demographic profiles, including age and sex composition, are available via the Census Bureau’s county tables. Gender differences in email use are generally smaller than age and connectivity factors at the county scale.

Infrastructure constraints are commonly documented in federal broadband availability reporting and rural deployment programs, including the FCC National Broadband Map.

Mobile Phone Usage

Treasure County is a sparsely populated, rural county in southeastern Montana, centered on Hysham along the Yellowstone River corridor. Much of the county consists of open rangeland and river breaks with long distances between population centers. Low population density, extensive road miles, and varied terrain along river valleys and uplands are structural factors that tend to reduce the density of cellular sites and increase coverage gaps compared with urban parts of Montana.

Key distinction: network availability vs. adoption

  • Network availability refers to where mobile providers report service coverage (e.g., 4G LTE or 5G) and where signal is considered present.
  • Household adoption refers to whether residents actually subscribe to mobile service and/or rely on mobile data for internet access at home (including “cellular-only” households).

County-specific adoption metrics for mobile subscriptions and smartphone ownership are not consistently published at a fine geographic level; the most comparable public indicators typically come from U.S. Census household internet subscription tables and federal/state broadband mapping and reporting.

Mobile penetration and access indicators (publicly available measures)

Household internet subscription indicators (adoption proxy)

The most widely used public indicator for “mobile access” at the county level is household internet subscription type, including:

  • Cellular data plan (mobile broadband used for internet access at home)
  • Any internet subscription (broad adoption benchmark across all technologies)

These measures are available through the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS). Treasure County’s small population can produce larger margins of error in 1-year estimates; 5-year ACS tables are commonly used for rural counties.

Relevant sources:

  • U.S. Census Bureau (ACS) internet subscription tables via data.census.gov (search for Treasure County, MT and ACS “Internet Subscription” tables).
  • Montana statewide context via the U.S. Census Bureau program documentation for ACS methodology and reliability in small areas.

Limitations:

  • ACS measures household subscription types, not signal quality, speed, latency, or in-building coverage.
  • ACS does not directly report “mobile penetration” as subscriptions per capita; it reports household-level subscription categories.

Mobile-only reliance (cellular-only households)

A separate, commonly used indicator of reliance on mobile phones is the share of adults living in “wireless-only” households (no landline). County-level reporting for wireless-only status is typically not available in a consistently comparable public series; it is commonly published at national and state levels in health survey products rather than uniformly for all counties. No definitive Treasure County series is routinely published in the major federal statistical portals used for county comparisons.

Mobile internet usage patterns and network generation availability (4G/5G)

Reported coverage availability (network presence)

Public, map-based availability information for mobile broadband is primarily derived from:

  • FCC Broadband Data Collection (BDC) mobile coverage datasets and maps (provider-reported, location-based coverage modeling).

What can be stated definitively from standard rural Montana patterns and FCC reporting structure (without asserting unverified county-specific totals):

  • 4G LTE is generally the foundational coverage layer across rural Montana and is the most likely technology to provide broad-area service in Treasure County outside the town center.
  • 5G availability in rural counties is often present in limited areas (commonly along highways or within/near population centers) depending on provider deployments. The FCC map is the authoritative public source for identifying where providers report 5G coverage within the county.

Limitations and interpretation notes:

  • FCC mobile coverage is provider-reported and may not reflect indoor coverage, seasonal variability, or performance under load.
  • “Availability” on maps does not guarantee consistent user experience at a given location; it indicates where a provider reports meeting its service threshold.

Mobile broadband performance and typical rural usage considerations (non-speculative framing)

County-specific measured performance (download/upload/latency) is not consistently published as an official statistic for Treasure County alone. For Montana context and broader rural patterns, performance information is often derived from:

  • Aggregated test data sources and federal program reporting (not always standardized at the county level for definitive statements).
  • State broadband planning materials that summarize coverage, gaps, and challenges.

State context sources:

  • Montana Broadband Office (state planning, challenge processes, and broadband context that often includes mobile alongside fixed service).

Common device types (smartphones vs. other devices)

Direct, county-level estimates of smartphone ownership, feature phone prevalence, or device mix are generally not published as official statistics for Treasure County. The most defensible public approach is:

  • Use ACS household computer/device and internet subscription tables as proxies for the presence of internet-capable devices and how households connect (cellular plan vs. other subscriptions) using data.census.gov.
  • Rely on statewide/national device ownership surveys for device-type mix, while noting that these are not county-specific.

Definitive limitation:

  • No standardized federal dataset provides a Treasure County-specific breakdown of smartphones versus non-smartphones that is directly comparable across all U.S. counties.

Demographic and geographic factors influencing mobile usage and connectivity

Geography, settlement pattern, and infrastructure density (availability)

  • Low population density and long distances between homes and ranches typically reduce the economic feasibility of dense cellular tower placement, affecting both coverage continuity and capacity.
  • River valleys, breaks, and rolling uplands can create line-of-sight constraints, producing localized dead zones even where broader-area coverage is reported.
  • Transportation corridors (state highways and the Yellowstone River corridor) often concentrate coverage investment relative to more remote areas; FCC maps provide the definitive, provider-reported coverage footprint.

Population characteristics and service choices (adoption)

  • Rural households may rely more on mobile connectivity where fixed broadband options are limited, but the extent of that reliance in Treasure County should be measured using ACS “cellular data plan” subscription estimates rather than inferred.
  • Income, age distribution, and housing dispersion can influence subscription decisions and device replacement cycles. Treasure County-specific demographic baselines are available from:

Practical sources for county-specific documentation (authoritative references)

Summary

  • Availability: Publicly verifiable mobile network availability for Treasure County is best documented through the FCC’s provider-reported mobile broadband maps, which distinguish reported 4G LTE and 5G coverage footprints.
  • Adoption: Household adoption and reliance on mobile internet is best approximated using ACS household subscription tables (including “cellular data plan”), accessed through data.census.gov; device-type specifics (smartphone vs. feature phone) are not reliably available at the county level.
  • Drivers: Sparse settlement, large service areas, and terrain variability are primary structural constraints on coverage density and consistency; demographic factors affecting adoption are measurable via county demographic profiles but require ACS subscription tables to quantify mobile reliance.

Social Media Trends

Treasure County is a sparsely populated, rural county in southeastern Montana, anchored by the small town of Hysham along the Yellowstone River corridor. Its economy is closely tied to agriculture and ranching, and residents are geographically dispersed, factors that typically correlate with heavier reliance on mobile connectivity and community-focused online communication compared with urban counties in Montana.

User statistics (penetration and active use)

  • County-specific social media penetration: No regularly published, statistically reliable dataset reports social media penetration specifically for Treasure County due to its very small population base and survey sampling limits. Publicly available county-level estimates generally cover broadband availability and general connectivity rather than platform participation.
  • Best available benchmark (U.S. adults): Nationally, about 7 in 10 U.S. adults use social media (roughly 70%), based on the Pew Research Center social media fact sheet. Rural areas tend to be modestly lower than urban/suburban areas in many Pew measures of digital adoption, but Pew’s most reliable figures are reported at national level rather than for individual rural counties.
  • Local context indicator (connectivity constraints): Rural counties’ usage patterns are often shaped by access and speed. For county-level connectivity context in Montana, the FCC National Broadband Map provides location-based availability data (availability is not the same as adoption, but it influences feasible platform use such as video).

Age group trends (who uses social media most)

National patterns are the most robust proxy for local age skews in small counties:

  • Highest usage: Adults ages 18–29 show the highest social media adoption and the broadest multi-platform use (Pew).
  • Middle usage: Ages 30–49 remain high and tend to concentrate on a smaller set of platforms than 18–29.
  • Lower usage but substantial: Ages 50–64 show moderate adoption.
  • Lowest usage: 65+ are least likely to use social media, though usage has increased over time (Pew). Source: Pew Research Center social media use by age.

Gender breakdown

  • Overall: Pew reports that overall social media use is similar for men and women at the headline level for U.S. adults, with platform-specific differences more pronounced than the overall “any social media” measure.
  • Platform skews (national): Women are more likely than men to report using some visually oriented and socially networked platforms, while men are more represented on some discussion- and video-centric platforms; the exact pattern varies by platform and year in Pew’s platform tables. Source: Pew Research Center platform-by-platform gender breakdowns.

Most-used platforms (percentages where available)

County-level platform shares are not published reliably; nationally reported platform use provides the most defensible percentages:

Behavioral trends (engagement patterns and preferences)

  • Video as a default format: YouTube’s very high reach nationally, alongside growing short-form video use (e.g., TikTok, Instagram video), indicates that video is a primary cross-demographic content type, though rural bandwidth constraints can shift consumption toward lower-resolution or Wi‑Fi–dependent viewing.
  • Community information utility: Rural communities commonly use social platforms for local news, school and sports updates, weather and road conditions, and community events, with Facebook-style groups and pages typically serving as a hub for these functions; this aligns with Facebook’s broad national reach and its group-based design.
  • Multi-platform age segmentation: Younger adults show higher rates of multi-platform use (frequently combining YouTube, Instagram, TikTok, Snapchat), while older adults are more likely to concentrate on Facebook and YouTube, consistent with Pew’s age-by-platform profiles.
  • Messaging and “lightweight” engagement: Private messaging and group chats are a major mode of participation nationally, and in rural settings this often complements public posting, supporting coordination and community ties rather than influencer-style broadcasting.
  • News exposure via social: Social platforms remain a significant pathway for news discovery for many Americans; patterns vary by platform, with Facebook and YouTube commonly cited in major surveys of news use. Reference: Pew Research Center social media and news fact sheet.

Family & Associates Records

Treasure County, Montana, maintains limited family and associate-related public records at the county level, while most vital records are administered by the State of Montana. Birth and death certificates are issued and kept by the Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services, Vital Records section (Montana Vital Records (DPHHS)). Adoption records are generally handled through the Montana courts and state systems and are not maintained as open county public records.

County offices commonly maintain marriage records (marriage licenses/returns) and records connected to family relationships through property and court filings. Treasure County district court case records (including civil matters, some family-related proceedings, and other associate-linked case filings) are accessed through the statewide judiciary portal (Montana Judicial Branch) and its public case search (Montana Courts Public Access information). Recorded documents that can reflect family or associate relationships (deeds, liens, certain affidavits) are filed with the county clerk and recorder; contact and office access information is provided by Treasure County (Treasure County, Montana (official site)).

Online public databases vary by record type and statewide system participation; in-person access is typically available during business hours at the relevant office. Privacy restrictions apply to many vital records, sealed adoptions, certain court matters, and records containing sensitive personal identifiers.

Marriage & Divorce Records

Types of records available

  • Marriage licenses and certificates

    • Marriage licensing is handled at the county level in Montana. Treasure County issues marriage licenses through the county clerk office and maintains the local license/return record.
    • Official proof of a marriage may also be available as a state vital record after the marriage is registered with the state.

  • Divorce decrees

    • Divorces are adjudicated by the state district court serving Treasure County. The court maintains the divorce case file and the signed Final Decree of Dissolution of Marriage (divorce decree) and related orders (e.g., parenting plans, child support orders, property distribution).

  • Annulments

    • Annulments in Montana are handled as court matters in district court. The court maintains the annulment case file and the signed Decree of Invalidity (annulment decree), along with any related findings and orders.

Where records are filed and how they can be accessed

  • Marriage records (county)

    • Filed/maintained by: Treasure County’s county clerk office (the county office that issues marriage licenses).
    • Access: Requests are typically made directly to the county clerk office for copies or verification of the marriage license/record. Some older records may be available in county archives.

  • Marriage records (state vital records)

    • Filed/maintained by: Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services (DPHHS), Office of Vital Records, which maintains statewide marriage records as vital records once registered.
    • Access: Copies and verifications are requested through the state vital records office, subject to state eligibility rules and identification requirements.
    • Reference: Montana DPHHS Vital Records

  • Divorce and annulment records (court)

    • Filed/maintained by: The Montana District Court that serves Treasure County; the clerk of district court maintains civil case files, judgments, and decrees.
    • Access: Many docket-level details and some documents are accessible through Montana’s public court records system, and paper/electronic copies of specific documents are requested from the clerk of district court, subject to access restrictions.
    • Reference: Montana Judicial Branch

  • Divorce “vital record” indexes

    • Montana historically maintained divorce information for statistical/vital record purposes through state systems. Availability and the type of divorce record (index/verification versus full decree) differs from court records; the court decree remains the controlling legal document.

Typical information included in these records

  • Marriage license/record

    • Full legal names of parties (including prior names where collected)
    • Date and place of marriage (and/or license issuance date)
    • Ages or dates of birth (varies by form/era)
    • Residences/addresses at time of application (varies)
    • Officiant name/title and certification
    • Witness information (when recorded)
    • County file number/license number, filing dates, and clerk certification

  • Divorce decree and case file

    • Names of parties, case number, court, and venue
    • Date the decree is entered and judge’s signature
    • Findings and orders addressing:
      • Legal dissolution of the marriage
      • Division of property and debts
      • Spousal maintenance (alimony), when ordered
      • Parenting plan/custody determinations, when applicable
      • Child support orders, when applicable
      • Name restoration (when granted)
    • Related filings may include petitions, financial affidavits, settlement agreements, and hearing minutes/orders; not all are publicly accessible.

  • Annulment decree and case file

    • Names of parties, case number, court, and venue
    • Date the decree is entered and judge’s signature
    • Findings and legal basis for invalidity under Montana law
    • Associated orders regarding children, support, and property, when applicable

Privacy or legal restrictions

  • Marriage records

    • Montana vital records are governed by state law and administrative rules, and certified copies are generally issued only under state-authorized eligibility categories with required identification.
    • County-held marriage license records may be more accessible as local public records, but access can be limited for certain data elements and for newer records depending on applicable state privacy rules and local practices.

  • Divorce and annulment court records

    • Court records are generally public, but Montana courts may restrict access to specific documents or information by law or court order.
    • Common restrictions include:
      • Sealed cases or sealed filings by court order
      • Confidential information protected under court rules (e.g., Social Security numbers, financial account numbers, certain medical/mental health information)
      • Sensitive family-law information involving minors, abuse/neglect, or protected addresses, which may be redacted or withheld
    • The decree is typically available unless sealed; associated exhibits and reports (such as evaluations) are more likely to be restricted.

  • Identity verification and fees

    • Agencies and courts typically require identification for certified copies and charge statutory copying/certification fees. Processing times and formats (certified copy vs. plain copy vs. verification) vary by custodian.

Education, Employment and Housing

Treasure County is a sparsely populated rural county in southeastern Montana along the Yellowstone River, with Hysham as the county seat and primary service center. The county’s small population base and long travel distances shape schooling (single-district service area), employment (higher dependence on agriculture, public services, and regional job centers), and housing (predominantly owner-occupied single-family homes and rural properties).

Education Indicators

Public schools (counts and names)

  • Public school system: Treasure County is served by a single K–12 public district based in Hysham.
  • School(s): Public education is commonly organized as Hysham School (K–12) under Hysham Public Schools / Hysham School District (school naming conventions in very small districts often consolidate elementary and secondary into one campus). District overview and contacts are available via the Montana Office of Public Instruction (OPI) and the district’s own public-facing materials (district site naming varies over time; OPI is the stable reference).

Student–teacher ratios and graduation outcomes

  • Student–teacher ratios: In very small rural districts, ratios can fluctuate materially year to year due to cohort size. County-specific ratios are not consistently published as a single “county” statistic; a practical proxy is to use district-level staffing/enrollment from OPI’s reporting.
  • Graduation rates: Montana publishes graduation rates at the state and district level through OPI; countywide figures are generally represented through the local district’s reported outcomes. For the most current district graduation rate, the authoritative source is OPI’s accountability and report card publications (district-level reporting is the direct proxy for Treasure County).

Adult educational attainment (county level)

County-level adult attainment is published through U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) “Educational Attainment” tables.

  • High school diploma or higher (age 25+): Treasure County is highly likely to be at or above the rural Montana norm; the definitive county percentage is reported in ACS 5-year estimates (table series commonly used includes DP02/S1501).
  • Bachelor’s degree or higher (age 25+): Treasure County is typically below statewide urban counties due to rural occupational structure; the definitive county share is also reported in ACS 5-year estimates.
  • Reference source for the county profile: U.S. Census Bureau data.census.gov (ACS educational attainment).

Notable programs (STEM, vocational, AP)

  • Program availability: Small Montana K–12 districts commonly provide career and technical education (CTE) offerings through regional cooperation, distance learning, or shared instructors, with limited standalone AP course catalogs compared with larger high schools.
  • State frameworks: Montana’s CTE and academic standards/resources are centralized through OPI, including pathways aligned to agriculture, trades, and applied technology in rural settings. See Montana OPI Career and Technical Education for statewide program structure and local implementation context.

School safety measures and counseling resources

  • Safety planning: Montana public schools operate under required safety planning practices (e.g., emergency operations planning, drills, coordination with local law enforcement/emergency management), with policy guidance and training resources referenced through OPI and state school safety initiatives.
  • Student support: In small districts, counseling capacity is often provided via a school counselor and/or contracted behavioral health supports, supplemented by regional services. Statewide student mental health and safety resource hubs are referenced through OPI and partner agencies; the most consistent public reference point is OPI.

Data note: District-level ratios, program catalogs, and counseling staffing are most accurately reflected in district/OPI reporting rather than a county aggregate due to the county’s single-district structure and small enrollment.

Employment and Economic Conditions

Unemployment rate (most recent year available)

  • The most current official county unemployment estimates are produced by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics and state labor market information programs. Treasure County’s unemployment rate is best cited using the latest annual average or most recent month from LAUS.
  • Primary references:
  • Context for Treasure County: rural counties in this region often show seasonal variation tied to agriculture, construction, and public-sector employment cycles.

Major industries and employment sectors

Based on typical southeastern Montana rural economic structure and county profiles used by Montana LMI, leading sectors commonly include:

  • Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting (ranching and associated services)
  • Local government / public administration and education (county services and the school district)
  • Health care and social assistance (small local clinics, regional service use)
  • Retail trade and accommodation/food services (localized demand in Hysham; traffic along regional corridors)
  • Construction and transportation/warehousing (rural infrastructure and regional logistics)

Definitive sector employment shares are available through ACS industry/occupation tables and Montana LMI county profiles.

Common occupations and workforce breakdown

County occupational distributions in rural Montana typically skew toward:

  • Management/operations for farms and small businesses
  • Transportation and material moving (trucking, equipment operation)
  • Construction and extraction (construction trades; some equipment-intensive work)
  • Office and administrative support (county and school functions)
  • Service occupations (food service, maintenance)
  • Education, training, and library (school staffing)

The definitive county breakdown is reported in ACS occupation tables (e.g., “Occupation” profiles) via data.census.gov.

Commuting patterns and mean commute time

  • Commuting mode: Rural counties such as Treasure County are characterized by high drive-alone shares, limited or no fixed-route transit, and some home-based work tied to agriculture and self-employment.
  • Mean commute time: The most recent mean travel time to work for Treasure County is reported in ACS commuting tables (e.g., DP03). County residents often commute to nearby trade centers in neighboring counties for specialized services and jobs.
  • Reference: ACS “Commuting (Journey to Work)” tables.

Local employment vs. out-of-county work

  • Out-of-county work: A notable share of employed residents in small counties work outside the county due to limited local job base, with commuting to larger nearby labor markets.
  • The most authoritative measures come from:
    • ACS “Place of Work” and commuting tables via data.census.gov
    • Census LEHD/OnTheMap for inflow/outflow and worker residence-to-workplace patterns (where available for the county’s small geographies).

Data note: For small counties, some detailed workforce estimates may be suppressed or have large margins of error; ACS 5-year estimates and LEHD are the standard proxies used in public planning.

Housing and Real Estate

Homeownership rate and rental share

  • Treasure County is predominantly owner-occupied, consistent with rural Montana counties where single-family and farm/ranch housing dominates. The definitive owner/renter shares are published in ACS housing occupancy tables.
  • Reference: ACS Housing Occupancy and Tenure (owner vs. renter).

Median property values and recent trends

  • Median home value: County median value is reported in ACS (median value of owner-occupied housing units). In rural counties, values are often lower than state metros and can show volatility due to thin sales volumes.
  • Trend context (proxy): Recent Montana housing years have generally seen upward pressure on values statewide, but the magnitude in Treasure County can differ from fast-growing western Montana markets; fewer transactions can amplify swings.
  • Reference: ACS Median Value (Owner-Occupied Housing) for the county; local market trend confirmation typically comes from Montana housing reports (regional analyses vary by provider).

Typical rent prices

  • Median gross rent: Reported by ACS for Treasure County. Rural counties often have a smaller formal rental inventory, with rents influenced by limited supply and unit condition/age.
  • Reference: ACS Median Gross Rent.

Types of housing

  • Dominant stock: Single-family detached homes and rural residential lots (including farm/ranch-associated housing) are typical.
  • Rental stock: Smaller numbers of duplexes, small multifamily buildings, and mobile/manufactured homes; large apartment complexes are uncommon.
  • These distributions are captured in ACS “Units in Structure” tables (housing type).

Neighborhood characteristics (schools/amenities proximity)

  • Hysham-centered amenities: Most civic services are concentrated in Hysham (county offices, the K–12 school campus, and small-town retail/services). Outside Hysham, residences are often on rural parcels with longer drives to services.
  • Access pattern: Typical neighborhood context is low-density, with school proximity primarily relevant for in-town housing; rural households generally rely on school transportation and personal vehicles for access to school and activities.

Property tax overview (rate and typical homeowner cost)

  • System: Montana property taxes are based on taxable value (a portion of market value determined by property class) multiplied by local mill levies (county, school, and other districts). Rates vary by location and levies, so “average rate” is best represented using Montana Department of Revenue guidance and county levy information.
  • Typical homeowner cost: The most comparable publicly available county-level measure is often median real estate taxes paid from ACS (housing cost tables), which reflects actual household payments rather than nominal rates.
  • References:

Data note: For Treasure County, thin market activity and small sample sizes can widen uncertainty in ACS medians; ACS 5-year estimates remain the standard public benchmark for county-level housing cost indicators.

Table of Contents

Other Counties in Montana