Louisa County Local Demographic Profile

Louisa County, Iowa — key demographics

Population

  • 10,837 (2020 Census)
  • 10,7xx (2023 population estimate; slight decline vs. 2020)

Age and sex (ACS 5-year, latest available)

  • Under 5 years: ~6–7%
  • Under 18 years: ~24–25%
  • 65 years and over: ~19%
  • Female: ~49–50%

Race and ethnicity (ACS/QuickFacts)

  • White alone: ~86–87%
  • Black or African American alone: ~1%
  • American Indian and Alaska Native alone: ~0.5%
  • Asian alone: ~1%
  • Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone: ~0.1%
  • Two or more races: ~3–4%
  • Hispanic or Latino (of any race): ~19–20%
  • White alone, not Hispanic or Latino: ~73–75%

Households (ACS 5-year, latest available)

  • Households: ~4,100
  • Persons per household: ~2.6–2.7
  • Owner-occupied housing unit rate: ~78–79%

Insights

  • Notably diverse for rural Iowa, with roughly 1 in 5 residents Hispanic/Latino, driven by local food-processing employment.
  • Age structure is balanced, with about one-fifth 65+, implying stable demand for both K–12 and senior services.
  • Household size is slightly above the U.S. average, consistent with family-oriented labor migration patterns.

Sources: U.S. Census Bureau (2020 Decennial Census; American Community Survey 5-year estimates; QuickFacts for Louisa County, IA, most recent releases through 2023).

Email Usage in Louisa County

Louisa County, IA email usage (estimates)

  • Population and density: ~10,800 residents (2020), ~27 people per sq mile.
  • Estimated email users: ~8,000 residents (≈74% of total; ≈91% of adults).
  • Age distribution (share using email; approx. users):
    • 13–17: ~70% (≈500)
    • 18–29: ~98% (≈1,700)
    • 30–49: ~96% (≈2,400)
    • 50–64: ~92% (≈1,900)
    • 65+: ~85% (≈1,500)
  • Gender split: ~50% female, ~50% male among email users (negligible gender gap).
  • Digital access trends:
    • ~80% of households subscribe to broadband; ~88–90% have a computer.
    • 12–15% are smartphone‑only internet users.
    • Fiber/cable coverage is strongest in and around Wapello and Columbus Junction; outlying rural areas depend more on DSL and fixed wireless.
    • Connectivity has improved since 2020 with ongoing rural fiber builds along major corridors (e.g., US‑61/IA‑92), lifting adoption and speeds.

Figures synthesize 2020 Census population with national email adoption by age and gender (Pew) and ACS-style broadband/computer ownership patterns typical of rural Iowa to provide county‑level estimates.

Mobile Phone Usage in Louisa County

Mobile phone usage in Louisa County, Iowa (2024 estimates)

Overall adoption and usage

  • Population and adult base: About 10,800 residents; roughly 8,200 adults (18+).
  • Mobile phone users (any mobile): ~7,800 adults (≈95% of adults).
  • Smartphone users: ~7,000 adults (≈85% of adults).
  • Wireless-only households (no landline): ~3,260 of ~4,230 households (≈77%).
  • Smartphone-only internet users (no home computer broadband): ~1,640 adults (≈20%).

Demographic breakdown (usage patterns)

  • By age (share with a smartphone; local counts rounded):
    • 18–29: 96% (1,100 users) – highest app, social, and video use; heavy 5G use where available.
    • 30–49: 93% (2,520 users) – highest share of multi-line family plans; frequent tethering for homework and remote work.
    • 50–64: 86% (1,980 users) – strong adoption, growing use of banking/telehealth apps.
    • 65+: 68% (1,390 users) – adoption lags, but year-over-year growth continues as larger-screen 5G devices replace feature phones.
  • By income:
    • Lower-income households are markedly more mobile-dependent: smartphone ownership remains high, but home fixed broadband adoption lags, pushing hotspot and “phone-as-primary-internet” use above the county average.
  • By place:
    • Town centers (Wapello, Columbus Junction, Letts, Grandview, Morning Sun) show higher 5G and app usage; rural sections along the Iowa River bottoms have more LTE fallback and intermittent service.

Digital infrastructure snapshot

  • Networks present: AT&T (including FirstNet Band 14), Verizon (including C-band 5G where deployed), T-Mobile (extensive mid-band 5G), and UScellular (strong LTE, selective 5G). Major MVNOs ride these networks and are widely used.
  • Coverage:
    • 4G LTE: Broad coverage across populated areas and primary roads (US‑61, IA‑92, IA‑70, IA‑99).
    • 5G: Countywide low-band coverage from national carriers in and near towns; mid-band 5G concentrates along US‑61 and around Wapello and Columbus Junction, tapering in river-bottom terrain and wildlife areas (e.g., Port Louisa National Wildlife Refuge).
  • Performance:
    • Typical real-world mobile download speeds range from ~30–120 Mbps depending on carrier, location, and time of day; uploads commonly 5–20 Mbps; latency ~25–60 ms. Peak mid-band 5G speeds are achievable along US‑61 and in town centers; rural edges often fall back to LTE with lower throughput.
  • Backhaul and resiliency:
    • Fiber backhaul follows highway and rail corridors; upgraded FirstNet/AT&T sites and Verizon C-band buildouts since 2021 have improved capacity on key towers. River-bottom topography and tree cover still create localized dead zones and handoff issues on gravel-road segments.

How Louisa County differs from Iowa overall

  • Higher mobile dependence:
    • Wireless-only households run higher (≈77% in Louisa vs low-70s statewide), reflecting fewer competitive fixed-fiber options outside town centers and stronger reliance on mobile voice and data.
    • Smartphone-only internet use is higher (≈20% vs mid-teens statewide), particularly among lower-income and multilingual households.
  • Coverage and speeds:
    • 5G mid-band coverage is spottier than state averages driven by Iowa’s metro corridors; Louisa users see more LTE fallback and more variable speeds, especially in the Iowa River bottoms and conservation areas.
  • Demographics and adoption:
    • Younger working families and a sizable rural labor force keep overall smartphone adoption near state levels, but seniors’ adoption trails the statewide 65+ rate, widening the gap in telehealth and mobile banking use among older residents.
  • Usage patterns:
    • Greater reliance on mobile hotspots for homework and shift‑work coordination than the state average, tied to school connectivity initiatives and shift-based manufacturing and agriculture schedules.

Notes on estimation

  • Figures synthesize 2022–2023 ACS county demographics, state and rural smartphone adoption benchmarks, CDC/NCHS wireless-only household rates, and FCC/FirstNet coverage filings mapped to Louisa County’s geography. Numbers are rounded to reflect the scale of the county and typical year-to-year variation.

Social Media Trends in Louisa County

Social media usage in Louisa County, Iowa (modeled to local population using U.S. Census 2020 and Pew Research Center 2023–2024 usage rates)

Population base

  • Total population: ~10,837
  • 18+ adults (est. 77%): ~8,344
  • Teens 13–17 (est. 6.5%): ~704
  • People 13+ (adults + teens): ~9,048

Overall user stats (13+)

  • Use at least one social platform: 6,675 people (73.8% of 13+)
  • Adults 18+ who use social media: 6,006 (72% of adults)
  • Teens 13–17 who use social media: 669 (95% of teens)

Most-used platforms in Louisa County (estimated users and share of 13+)

  • YouTube: 7,594 users (83.9%)
  • Facebook: 5,836 (64.5%)
  • Instagram: 4,338 (48.0%)
  • TikTok: 3,198 (35.3%)
  • Snapchat: 2,925 (32.3%)
  • Pinterest: 2,920 (32.3%)
  • LinkedIn: 2,503 (27.7%)
  • WhatsApp: 2,420 (26.7%)
  • X (Twitter): 1,836 (20.3%)
  • Reddit: 1,836 (20.3%)
  • Nextdoor: 1,585 (17.5%)

Age-group patterns

  • Teens (13–17): Very high YouTube (95%); TikTok (63%), Snapchat (60%), Instagram (59%) lead; Facebook is niche (~23%).
  • Young adults (18–29): Heaviest on Instagram/Snapchat/TikTok; strong YouTube; Facebook still common but secondary.
  • 30–49: Broadest multi-platform use; Facebook and YouTube anchor; Instagram solid; LinkedIn meaningful for professionals; WhatsApp/Pinterest moderate.
  • 50–64: Facebook and YouTube dominate; Pinterest moderate; TikTok/Instagram smaller but growing.
  • 65+: Primarily Facebook (for family, community) and YouTube (news/how-to); limited use of newer apps.

Gender breakdown (pattern, not totals)

  • Overall social media usage is roughly even by gender in aggregate.
  • Platform skews: Pinterest strongly female; Facebook modestly female-leaning; Instagram slightly female-leaning; YouTube slightly male-leaning; Reddit and X (Twitter) male-leaning; Snapchat mixed to slightly female-leaning; LinkedIn balanced to slightly male-leaning.

Behavioral trends observed in rural Midwestern counties (applicable to Louisa County)

  • Facebook is the community hub: heavy use of Groups (schools, churches, youth sports, local government), Events, and especially Marketplace for buy/sell/trade.
  • Video-first consumption: YouTube for how-to, local sports highlights, ag/DIY content; short-form video (Reels/TikTok) drives discovery for local businesses and events.
  • Messaging over posting: Younger users rely on Snapchat and Instagram DMs; adults use Facebook Messenger; WhatsApp pockets exist for family/work coordination.
  • Lurkers > posters: Most users consume and react; a smaller core creates content, especially in Groups and short-form video.
  • Local news and alerts: Weather, road closures, school updates, and public safety posts see high engagement on Facebook.
  • Seasonality: Spikes around school-year sports, county fair, holidays, and harvest-related content; weekends and evenings see higher engagement.
  • Commerce: Marketplace and local business pages are primary for product discovery; couponing and limited-time offers drive clicks more than long-form posts.
  • Trust and authenticity: User-generated photos/videos, recognizable local faces, and plain-language posts outperform polished corporate-style creative.

Notes on methodology

  • Population: U.S. Census 2020 for Louisa County.
  • Adult platform reach and “any social media” rates: Pew Research Center, Social Media Use in 2024 (U.S. adults).
  • Teen platform rates: Pew Research Center, Teens, Social Media and Technology 2023.
  • Local figures are modeled by applying national usage rates to the county’s age cohorts; treat as directional, county-calibrated estimates.