Louisa County is a rural county in southeastern Iowa, situated along the Mississippi River and bordered to the south by the Iowa River near its confluence with the Mississippi. Established in 1836 and named for Louisa Massey, it developed as part of Iowa’s early river-oriented settlement and trade corridor, with agriculture remaining central as transportation shifted from river traffic to rail and highways. The county is small in population, with a community pattern of small towns and farmsteads rather than large urban centers. Its landscape includes broad river floodplains, wetlands, and productive farmland, alongside timbered areas and backwater habitats associated with the Mississippi River system. The local economy is anchored by row-crop farming and related agribusiness, with additional employment tied to manufacturing, services, and regional commuting. The county seat is Wapello, located near the Iowa River.
Louisa County Local Demographic Profile
Louisa County is located in southeastern Iowa along the Mississippi River, with Wapello serving as the county seat. It forms part of Iowa’s river-border region adjacent to Illinois.
Population Size
According to the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts for Louisa County, Iowa, county-level demographic totals (including population and housing) are published by the Census Bureau, but the exact figures cannot be stated here because no source tables or values were provided in the prompt and live data retrieval is not available in this environment.
For county administration and planning context, visit the Louisa County official website.
Age & Gender
The U.S. Census Bureau provides county-level age structure and sex composition (including median age, age-group shares, and the percent male/female) through QuickFacts (Louisa County, Iowa). Exact age distribution and gender ratio values cannot be stated here because the numeric values are not accessible in this environment.
Racial & Ethnic Composition
County-level racial and ethnic composition (race categories and Hispanic/Latino origin) for Louisa County is reported by the U.S. Census Bureau via QuickFacts. Exact percentages by race and ethnicity cannot be stated here because the numeric values are not accessible in this environment.
Household and Housing Data
The Census Bureau publishes household and housing indicators for Louisa County (e.g., number of households, average household size, homeownership rate, housing unit counts, and selected housing characteristics) in QuickFacts (Louisa County, Iowa). Exact household and housing figures cannot be stated here because the numeric values are not accessible in this environment.
For additional official Iowa demographic and community data portals used in local planning, see the State of Iowa open data site.
Email Usage
Louisa County’s largely rural geography and low population density shape digital communication by making last‑mile network buildout more costly and uneven, which can limit reliable home internet access and, by extension, routine email use.
Direct, county-level email usage statistics are generally not published; email access is commonly inferred from proxy indicators such as household broadband subscriptions, computer availability, and age structure reported in the U.S. Census Bureau’s data portal. These measures track whether residents have the core prerequisites for regular email (a connected device and an internet subscription).
Age distribution is relevant because older age cohorts tend to have lower rates of adoption for some online communication tools; Louisa County’s age profile in American Community Survey tables provides context for potential variation in email uptake across households.
Gender distribution is typically less predictive of email access than age and connectivity; county sex composition is available through Census demographic profiles.
Infrastructure and connectivity constraints in rural areas are reflected in service-availability and deployment reporting tracked by the FCC National Broadband Map.
Mobile Phone Usage
Louisa County is in southeastern Iowa along the Mississippi River, with a largely rural landscape, small towns (including Wapello as the county seat), and extensive agricultural land. This settlement pattern typically produces lower population density outside town centers, which can reduce the economic feasibility of dense tower grids and can contribute to coverage gaps or weaker indoor reception in sparsely populated areas. County-level connectivity is influenced by river valleys, wooded areas near the Mississippi corridor, and the distance between population clusters, all of which can affect signal propagation and backhaul placement.
Key distinction: network availability vs. adoption
- Network availability describes whether mobile broadband service is reported as available in an area (coverage).
- Household adoption describes whether residents subscribe to and use mobile broadband (usage), which is shaped by cost, device ownership, digital skills, and the availability/quality of alternatives such as fixed broadband.
Availability and adoption do not move in lockstep; areas can show reported 4G/5G coverage while still having lower rates of mobile-broadband subscription or heavy reliance on mobile due to limited fixed options.
Mobile penetration or access indicators (county-level availability and adoption)
Availability indicators (coverage and service presence)
- The primary public source for U.S. mobile broadband availability is the FCC’s Broadband Data Collection (BDC), which publishes provider-reported mobile coverage polygons and location-based broadband availability layers. County-level summaries can be derived from FCC map views and downloads, but the FCC does not present “mobile penetration” as a single county statistic in the same way some international regulators do. Relevant sources:
- FCC National Broadband Map (interactive map for mobile and fixed broadband availability)
- FCC Broadband Data Collection (BDC) (methodology, data access, and reporting details)
Limitations: FCC availability reflects provider filings subject to challenge processes and may overstate real-world performance in fringe areas. It measures reported coverage, not observed speeds everywhere.
Adoption indicators (subscriptions and usage)
- The most commonly cited county-level adoption measure in federal statistics is household subscription to various internet types, including cellular data plans. The U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS) provides “Computer and Internet Use” tables that can be used to identify:
- Households with an internet subscription
- Households with a cellular data plan (often used as a proxy for mobile internet subscription)
- Households with smartphone/computer types in some ACS products
- Sources:
- Census.gov data tables (ACS) (county geographies available for many internet-subscription measures)
- American Community Survey (ACS) (survey documentation and methodology)
- Census Computer and Internet Use (topic hub and reference materials)
Limitations: Some detailed device-type measures are more robust at state/national levels than at small-county geographies due to sampling and margins of error. ACS is subscription-based, not a direct measure of signal quality or network performance.
Mobile internet usage patterns (4G/LTE and 5G availability)
4G/LTE
- 4G/LTE is generally the baseline mobile broadband layer across rural Iowa, including counties with dispersed populations. In rural counties, LTE may be the dominant layer for consistent area-wide coverage, with stronger performance closer to towns and major roads.
- County-specific reported LTE availability can be inspected using:
5G (including mid-band and mmWave)
- 5G availability in rural counties is often uneven: it may exist along highways, near population centers, or where carriers have upgraded sites, while large agricultural areas may remain LTE-dominant.
- The FCC map provides carrier-reported 5G coverage layers; however, it does not always differentiate “capacity/quality” in a way that communicates whether the 5G layer is low-band (coverage-oriented) or higher-capacity mid-band/mmWave. Independent speed-test aggregations are typically not authoritative at county granularity and may be biased toward where tests occur.
- Sources:
Limitations: Publicly available federal datasets do not provide a definitive countywide breakdown of “share of users on 4G vs 5G.” Observed device connection behavior depends on handset capability, plan, congestion, and radio conditions.
Common device types (smartphones vs. other devices)
- Smartphones are the primary consumer mobile device category used for mobile internet access in U.S. counties, including rural counties. County-level confirmation is usually inferred from ACS “computer type” and “internet subscription type” tables, which can show:
- Presence of smartphones (in some ACS products/years and table structures)
- Reliance on cellular data plans as a subscription type
- Other connected devices present in households and businesses include tablets, mobile hotspots, fixed wireless customer-premises equipment (not a mobile device but often conflated with “wireless”), and IoT devices. Public county-level estimates for these categories are limited.
- Primary sources for county-level device/subscription indicators:
Limitations: County-level smartphone ownership and detailed device mix are not consistently published as high-confidence single metrics for all counties; results can have substantial margins of error in smaller populations.
Demographic and geographic factors influencing mobile usage in Louisa County
Rural settlement pattern and population density
- Lower density tends to correlate with fewer cell sites per square mile and greater distances between towers, which can reduce indoor coverage consistency and raise the importance of line-of-sight and antenna height. In Louisa County, the rural landscape and small-town distribution are important contextual factors affecting both availability and user experience.
River corridor and terrain/land cover
- The Mississippi River corridor and adjacent wooded or low-lying areas can create localized propagation challenges compared with flatter open farmland. These effects are highly site-specific and not fully captured by coverage maps at coarse scales.
Income, age, and household characteristics (adoption side)
- In federal survey research, mobile-only or mobile-reliant internet use is often more common among:
- Lower-income households
- Younger adults
- Renters and more mobile populations
- County-specific values are available through ACS demographic profiles and internet subscription tables, with appropriate attention to margins of error:
Limitations: While the direction of these associations is well-established nationally, county-specific adoption patterns require direct extraction from ACS tables and should be reported with their survey uncertainty.
Fixed-broadband alternatives and “mobile substitution”
- Areas with limited fixed broadband options sometimes show higher reliance on cellular data plans for home connectivity. This is an adoption/behavior outcome and cannot be inferred solely from mobile coverage. The comparison of fixed vs mobile subscription types is available in ACS subscription tables, while fixed availability is also mapped by the FCC:
What is and is not available at Louisa County granularity (data limitations)
- Available at county level (most consistently):
- ACS estimates of household internet subscription types (including cellular data plan) and selected device indicators via Census.gov.
- FCC provider-reported mobile broadband availability visualized and downloadable via the FCC National Broadband Map.
- Commonly not available as a definitive county statistic:
- A single “mobile penetration rate” (SIMs per 100 people) analogous to international telecom reporting.
- Observed share of residents actively using 5G vs LTE, or typical on-device connection mode, without relying on non-authoritative commercial telemetry.
- Detailed countywide device mix beyond what ACS captures (e.g., hotspots/IoT counts).
Relevant state and local context sources
- State broadband planning and grant documentation can provide context on broader connectivity conditions and infrastructure priorities in rural Iowa, although these sources typically focus more on fixed broadband than on mobile:
- County context (population centers, land use, and local planning references) can be verified through:
Overall, the most defensible county-level picture combines (1) FCC-reported mobile network availability (4G/5G coverage layers) with (2) ACS-measured household adoption indicators (cellular data plan subscription and related internet/device measures), reported with attention to survey uncertainty and the known limitations of provider-reported coverage maps.
Social Media Trends
Louisa County is a rural county in southeastern Iowa along the Mississippi River, with Wapello as the county seat and proximity to Muscatine and Burlington influencing commuting, media markets, and broadband access. Agriculture, river-related recreation, and small-town community networks shape local information sharing, with residents often relying on a mix of in-person ties and digital channels for local news, school activities, and community updates.
User statistics (local availability and best proxies)
- County-specific social media penetration figures are not published in major recurring national datasets. Publicly available, methodologically consistent estimates are generally reported at the national or state level rather than by county.
- National benchmark (U.S. adults): About 69% of U.S. adults report using social media, providing the most-cited baseline for interpreting usage in smaller U.S. geographies such as rural counties. Source: Pew Research Center social media fact sheet.
- Local context factor (rurality): Social media use is widespread in rural areas but tends to be modestly lower than in urban/suburban areas, aligning with differences in connectivity and age structure. Source: Pew Research Center social media fact sheet.
Age group trends (who uses social media most)
National survey patterns provide the clearest age gradients relevant to rural counties:
- Highest usage: 18–29 and 30–49 adults show the highest overall social media adoption.
- Moderate usage: 50–64 adults use social media at lower rates than younger groups but remain a majority on at least one platform.
- Lowest usage: 65+ adults have the lowest overall adoption and tend to concentrate on fewer platforms.
- Source for age patterns and platform-by-age: Pew Research Center social media fact sheet.
Gender breakdown
- Overall social media use by gender (U.S. adults) is typically similar, with larger gender differences appearing at the platform level rather than in overall adoption.
- Platform-level gender skews commonly reported in national surveys include higher use among women on visually oriented and socially networked platforms (notably Pinterest), while some platforms show smaller differences.
- Source: Pew Research Center social media fact sheet.
Most-used platforms (share of U.S. adults; best available proxy)
County-level platform shares are not routinely published; the following are widely used national benchmarks:
- YouTube: ~83%
- Facebook: ~68%
- Instagram: ~47%
- Pinterest: ~35%
- TikTok: ~33%
- LinkedIn: ~30%
- X (Twitter): ~22%
- Snapchat: ~27%
- WhatsApp: ~29%
Source: Pew Research Center social media fact sheet.
Behavioral trends (engagement patterns and preferences)
- Multi-platform use is common, but intensity differs by platform. Video-centric platforms (especially YouTube) tend to serve entertainment and “how-to” needs, while Facebook remains a core venue for local groups, school/community announcements, and peer-to-peer sharing in many U.S. communities. Source: Pew Research Center social media fact sheet.
- Age-driven engagement patterns: Younger adults show higher engagement on short-form video and creator-led feeds (notably TikTok and Instagram), while older adults are more concentrated on Facebook and YouTube. Source: Pew Research Center social media fact sheet.
- News and local information: Social platforms play a role in news discovery and sharing for many adults, though usage for news varies substantially by platform and demographic group. Source: Pew Research Center social media and news fact sheet.
- Messaging and community coordination: Private or semi-private coordination (Messenger, group pages, and chat-based sharing) is a recurring pattern in smaller communities, where social graphs often mirror offline networks; public posting tends to be less frequent than passive consumption for many users. Source: Pew Research Center report on Americans’ social media use.
Family & Associates Records
Louisa County, Iowa maintains several family and associate-related public records through county and state offices. Vital events (births and deaths) are recorded by the county registrar via the Louisa County Recorder; certified copies are generally issued through the recorder’s vital records function and governed by Iowa’s state vital records system. Marriage records are typically filed with the county and are part of public record access through the Recorder’s office. Divorce records are maintained by the Iowa Judicial Branch (district court) rather than the recorder, and are accessed through court records systems.
Online access to local public records is commonly provided through the county’s recorded document search portal (deeds, liens, and related filings that often reflect family or associate relationships), available from the official Louisa County website: Louisa County, Iowa (official site). In-person access is provided at county offices, including the Louisa County Recorder for recorded documents and many vital-records services. Court record access is provided through the Iowa Courts Electronic Docket (EDMS/ESA).
Privacy restrictions apply to many family records. Iowa limits access to birth certificates and some other vital records to eligible requesters for defined periods; adoption records are generally sealed except under statutory processes. Fees, identification requirements, and certified-copy rules are set by the responsible office.
Marriage & Divorce Records
Types of records available
- Marriage license and return (marriage record)
- Marriage records in Iowa originate as a marriage license issued by the county and are completed by the return/certificate signed by the officiant and filed back with the county.
- Divorce decree and case file
- Divorce records are created through the district court and typically include a final decree and related pleadings, orders, and settlement documents (the “case file”).
- Annulment decree and case file
- Annulments are also handled through the district court and result in an annulment decree and related case filings. Annulments are recorded as civil court matters rather than as a separate “vital record” type at the county recorder level.
Where records are filed and how they can be accessed
- Marriage records (county level)
- Filed/maintained by: Louisa County Recorder (marriage licenses and completed returns).
- Access: Copies are requested from the Louisa County Recorder’s Office. Iowa also maintains statewide marriage records through the Iowa Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Bureau of Vital Records for eligible requests under state vital records rules.
- Divorce and annulment records (court level)
- Filed/maintained by: Iowa District Court (in the county where the case is filed), with the Clerk of Court serving as the custodian of the court record. Louisa County is within Iowa’s district court system.
- Access: Court records are accessed through the Clerk of Court and, for many nonconfidential docket and document entries, through Iowa’s online Iowa Courts Online Search portal. Some documents may be viewable only at the courthouse or may be restricted from public view depending on confidentiality rules and sealing orders.
Typical information included in these records
- Marriage license/return
- Full names of both parties (including prior/maiden names where reported)
- Date and place of marriage
- Ages and/or dates of birth and places of birth (as recorded on the application)
- Current residences and sometimes prior marital status
- Parents’ names (commonly recorded on Iowa marriage applications)
- Officiant’s name/title and the date the license was returned and recorded
- License number/recording reference assigned by the county recorder
- Divorce decree and related case documents
- Names of the parties and case number
- Date of filing and date of decree
- Findings and orders dissolving the marriage
- Provisions addressing legal custody/physical care and parenting time (when applicable)
- Child support and medical support terms (when applicable)
- Spousal support/alimony provisions (when applicable)
- Property division and debt allocation
- Name change orders (when granted)
- Annulment decree and related case documents
- Names of the parties and case number
- Date of filing and date of decree
- Court determination that the marriage is annulled/void or voidable under Iowa law, with related findings
- Ancillary orders that may address financial issues, property, and matters involving children when applicable
Privacy or legal restrictions
- Marriage records
- Iowa treats marriage records as vital records administered under state law. Certified copies are commonly issued to eligible requestors under Iowa vital records rules; informational/noncertified copies may be available depending on the request and the custodian’s policies.
- Divorce and annulment court records
- Iowa court records are generally public, but specific information and documents can be confidential by statute or court rule (for example, protected identifiers and certain sensitive filings). Courts may also seal records or portions of records by order.
- Confidential information protections typically apply to items such as Social Security numbers, financial account numbers, and certain information involving minors, and may limit online display even when a case exists on the public docket.
Reference links (official sources)
- Louisa County Recorder (marriage records): https://www.louisacountyiowa.org/
- Iowa HHS, Bureau of Vital Records (statewide vital records): https://hhs.iowa.gov/vital-records
- Iowa Judicial Branch – Iowa Courts Online Search (court case access): https://www.iowacourts.state.ia.us/ESAWebApp/DefaultFrame
Education, Employment and Housing
Louisa County is a rural county in southeast Iowa along the Mississippi River, with its county seat in Wapello and its largest city in Columbus Junction. The county’s population is small (about 11,000 residents, based on recent U.S. Census estimates) and dispersed across small towns and agricultural areas, with regional employment ties to larger labor markets in the Iowa City–Cedar Rapids corridor and the Quad Cities.
Education Indicators
Public school districts, schools, and names
Public K–12 education in Louisa County is primarily provided by two districts:
- Columbus Community School District (serving Columbus Junction and surrounding areas)
- Schools commonly listed under the district include Columbus Elementary School, Columbus Middle School, and Columbus High School (district configuration can change by year; official listings are maintained by the district and Iowa DOE report cards).
- Wapello Community School District (serving Wapello and surrounding areas)
- Schools commonly listed include Wapello Elementary School, Wapello Middle/High School (or separate middle and high school listings depending on reporting format).
A consolidated, authoritative directory of public schools by district is maintained through the Iowa Department of Education and district report cards (see the Iowa school district information resources and linked district pages).
Student–teacher ratios and graduation rates
- Student–teacher ratios: District-level student–teacher ratios are published in Iowa’s district profiles/report cards and typically fall within the mid-teens to around 20:1 for many small rural districts in Iowa. A single countywide ratio is not generally reported; the most accurate figures are by district and building.
- Graduation rates: Iowa reports 4-year cohort graduation rates by district and school. Recent Iowa statewide rates have been in the high 80% to around 90% range, while individual rural districts commonly vary year-to-year due to small graduating classes. The most recent district-specific graduation rates are available on the Iowa Data Center and Iowa school report card publications.
Data note: A countywide graduation rate and student–teacher ratio are not standard single-summary metrics in Iowa; district report cards provide the most recent and definitive values.
Adult education levels (county residents)
Using the most recent American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year estimates (county profile level):
- High school diploma or higher (age 25+): Louisa County is typically around the mid-to-high 80% range, similar to many rural Iowa counties.
- Bachelor’s degree or higher (age 25+): Louisa County is typically around the mid-to-high teens (%), below Iowa’s statewide share and well below major metro counties.
Authoritative county adult-education attainment tables are available through the U.S. Census Bureau’s data portal (ACS 5-year, Educational Attainment).
Notable programs (STEM, vocational training, AP)
- Career and Technical Education (CTE): Iowa public high schools generally provide CTE pathways (agriculture, business, family and consumer sciences, industrial tech, health-related pathways), often supported by regional partnerships and community college articulation.
- Advanced coursework: Advanced Placement (AP), concurrent enrollment, and/or community college dual-credit options are commonly used statewide; availability varies by high school size and staffing. The most reliable confirmation is through each district’s course catalog and Iowa report card program listings.
- STEM: STEM coursework is typically embedded through state standards and locally offered electives; smaller districts often emphasize applied STEM through agriculture/industrial tech and project-based learning rather than large specialized academies.
Data note: Program inventories (AP course count, dual-credit participation, CTE concentrators) are reported in Iowa district profiles, but they are not consistently summarized at the county level across all districts without compiling multiple district reports.
School safety measures and counseling resources
- Safety measures: Iowa districts commonly use secured entry procedures, visitor check-in, emergency response plans, drills aligned with state guidance, and coordination with local law enforcement. District safety planning frameworks align with state school safety guidance and reporting.
- Counseling/mental health supports: Student services typically include school counseling staff and referral pathways; Iowa also supports school-based mental health initiatives through state and regional resources. District staffing (counselor ratios and support roles) is best verified in district staffing profiles and annual certified enrollment/staff reports.
Employment and Economic Conditions
Unemployment rate (most recent)
- The most recent annual unemployment figures for Louisa County are published through the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (LAUS). Recent county unemployment rates in Iowa have generally been low (often in the 2%–4% range annually), with year-to-year variation.
- The definitive current value is available via the BLS Local Area Unemployment Statistics (LAUS) (county annual averages).
Data note: A single “most recent year” value changes annually; LAUS annual averages are the standard reference.
Major industries and employment sectors
Based on ACS/County Business Patterns patterns typical for rural southeast Iowa and Louisa County’s employer mix:
- Manufacturing (including food/industrial production and related supply chains)
- Health care and social assistance
- Educational services (public schools as major local employers)
- Retail trade
- Construction
- Agriculture and related services (not always fully captured in payroll datasets due to farm proprietorship structures)
The most consistent sector shares for resident employment are available in ACS “Industry by Occupation” and “Industry by Sex” tables via data.census.gov.
Common occupations and workforce breakdown
Resident workers commonly concentrate in:
- Production, transportation, and material moving
- Management, business, and financial operations (smaller share than metro counties)
- Office and administrative support
- Sales
- Construction and extraction
- Education, training, and library
- Healthcare support and practitioner roles
County occupation distributions are available in ACS occupation tables on data.census.gov.
Commuting patterns and mean commute times
- Commuting mode: Personal vehicles dominate commuting in rural Iowa counties; carpooling is present but smaller, and public transit commuting is minimal.
- Mean commute time: Louisa County commute times typically align with rural counties that are tied to nearby regional job centers, commonly in the low-to-mid 20-minute range (ACS mean travel time to work).
- Work destination patterns: A substantial share of residents work outside the county, commuting to larger nearby employment centers (including Iowa City/Cedar Rapids areas and the Quad Cities region), while local employment is concentrated in schools, health services, manufacturing, retail, and county/municipal services.
Definitive metrics for mean commute time and “worked in county of residence” are published in ACS commuting tables on data.census.gov.
Housing and Real Estate
Homeownership rate and rental share
- Louisa County is predominantly owner-occupied, typical of rural Iowa counties:
- Homeownership: commonly around 75%–85%
- Renters: commonly around 15%–25% These values are reported in ACS tenure tables on data.census.gov.
Median property values and recent trends
- Median owner-occupied home value: Louisa County home values are typically below Iowa’s metro counties and below the national median, reflecting a rural market with smaller towns and agricultural adjacency.
- Trends: Like most of Iowa, Louisa County experienced price appreciation from 2020–2023 driven by tight inventory and higher construction/financing costs, with slower growth as interest rates increased. County-specific median value trends can be tracked in ACS (median value by year of release) and property assessor sales data.
For benchmark median value estimates, use ACS “Median Value (Dollars)” for owner-occupied housing via data.census.gov. For transaction-level sales context, county assessor/treasurer resources provide local detail.
Typical rent prices
- Median gross rent: Generally lower than metro Iowa; county medians in rural Iowa commonly fall in the mid-$600s to under $900 range depending on the year and sample size. Definitive county medians are reported in ACS “Median Gross Rent” tables on data.census.gov.
Data note: Rural counties can show volatility in median rent due to smaller rental inventories; ACS 5-year estimates are the standard stable reference.
Types of housing
- Single-family detached homes dominate in towns and rural settings.
- Manufactured housing and mobile homes are present in rural and edge-of-town areas.
- Apartments and small multifamily buildings are limited and mostly concentrated in towns such as Columbus Junction and Wapello.
- Rural lots and acreages are common outside city limits, including farmsteads and smaller rural residential parcels.
Neighborhood characteristics (proximity to schools/amenities)
- Town-centered amenities: Most services (schools, clinics, grocery/retail, parks) cluster within the incorporated towns; proximity to schools is generally highest within town limits due to the small size of communities.
- Rural character: Outside towns, housing is more dispersed with greater travel distance to schools and services, consistent with an agricultural landscape and river-adjacent geography.
Property tax overview (rate and typical cost)
- Iowa property taxes are administered locally but governed by state classification rules and rollbacks. In practice:
- Effective property tax rates (tax paid as a share of market value) in Iowa often fall around ~1.3%–1.8% for many homeowners, varying by jurisdiction, valuations, levies, and rollback factors.
- Typical homeowner cost depends primarily on assessed value and local levies (school, county, city). Louisa County’s smaller tax base and school levies can meaningfully influence bills.
Authoritative county-level valuation, levy, and tax information is published by the Iowa Department of Management property tax division and local county treasurer/assessor reports.
Proxy note: A single “average property tax bill” is not consistently published as a standard county metric across all sources; effective rate ranges and local levy reports are the most defensible county-level framing without compiling parcel-level data.
Table of Contents
Other Counties in Iowa
- Adair
- Adams
- Allamakee
- Appanoose
- Audubon
- Benton
- Black Hawk
- Boone
- Bremer
- Buchanan
- Buena Vista
- Butler
- Calhoun
- Carroll
- Cass
- Cedar
- Cerro Gordo
- Cherokee
- Chickasaw
- Clarke
- Clay
- Clayton
- Clinton
- Crawford
- Dallas
- Davis
- Decatur
- Delaware
- Des Moines
- Dickinson
- Dubuque
- Emmet
- Fayette
- Floyd
- Franklin
- Fremont
- Greene
- Grundy
- Guthrie
- Hamilton
- Hancock
- Hardin
- Harrison
- Henry
- Howard
- Humboldt
- Ida
- Iowa
- Jackson
- Jasper
- Jefferson
- Johnson
- Jones
- Keokuk
- Kossuth
- Lee
- Linn
- Lucas
- Lyon
- Madison
- Mahaska
- Marion
- Marshall
- Mills
- Mitchell
- Monona
- Monroe
- Montgomery
- Muscatine
- Obrien
- Osceola
- Page
- Palo Alto
- Plymouth
- Pocahontas
- Polk
- Pottawattamie
- Poweshiek
- Ringgold
- Sac
- Scott
- Shelby
- Sioux
- Story
- Tama
- Taylor
- Union
- Van Buren
- Wapello
- Warren
- Washington
- Wayne
- Webster
- Winnebago
- Winneshiek
- Woodbury
- Worth
- Wright