Butler County Local Demographic Profile
Butler County, Iowa – key demographics (latest Census/ACS estimates; rounded)
Population
- Total: 14,334 (2020 Census). Latest ACS (2019–2023): ~14.2k
Age
- Median age: ~45 years
- Under 18: ~22%
- 18–64: ~55%
- 65 and over: ~23%
Gender
- Female: ~50.5%
- Male: ~49.5%
Race/ethnicity (ACS 2019–2023)
- White alone: ~95–96%
- Black or African American: ~0.4–0.5%
- American Indian/Alaska Native: ~0.2%
- Asian: ~0.2–0.3%
- Two or more races: ~2.5–3%
- Hispanic or Latino (any race): ~2–3%
Households (ACS 2019–2023)
- Total households: ~6,000
- Average household size: ~2.3
- Family households: ~59% (married-couple ~49%)
- Nonfamily households: ~41%
- Owner-occupied housing: ~80% (renters ~20%)
Sources: U.S. Census Bureau 2020 Decennial Census; American Community Survey 2019–2023 5-year estimates.
Email Usage in Butler County
Butler County, IA email usage (estimates)
Population base: ~14,000 residents; ~11,000 adults (18+).
Estimated email users: 10.5–12.0k residents use email at least monthly (≈88–92% of adults; teens 13–17 add ~0.8k users).
Age mix of email users:
- 13–17: ~7%
- 18–34: ~20%
- 35–54: ~35%
- 55–64: ~18%
- 65+: ~20% Usage intensity is highest among 18–54; adoption among 65+ is widespread but somewhat less frequent.
Gender split among users: roughly even, ~50–51% female, ~49–50% male (mirrors county demographics).
Digital access/connection trends:
- Home broadband subscription is likely in the high-70s to mid-80s percent of households (in line with rural Iowa ACS patterns), with smartphone‑only internet in roughly 10–15% of households.
- Connectivity is strongest in towns (Allison, Parkersburg, Shell Rock, Clarksville, Greene, Aplington) with cable/fiber; DSL and fixed‑wireless remain common in outlying areas.
- Mobile LTE/5G covers most populated corridors; speeds and reliability drop on rural roads.
- Public Wi‑Fi via libraries/schools supplements home access.
Local density/context:
- Low rural density (~25 residents per square mile) raises last‑mile costs, producing a mix of fiber/cable in towns and wireless/DSL in the countryside.
Notes: Figures are modeled from 2020–2023 Census/ACS and national email adoption benchmarks.
Mobile Phone Usage in Butler County
Mobile phone usage in Butler County, Iowa — 2025 snapshot
Context size
- Population: roughly 14,000–15,000 residents; about 5,500–6,000 households.
- Older-than-state age profile and lower population density than Iowa overall.
User estimates
- Adult smartphone users: about 8,500–9,500 (roughly 80–85% of adults; slightly lower than Iowa’s ~85–90%).
- Total active mobile lines (phones, tablets, watches, hotspots, farm/IoT): about 12,000–15,000.
- 5G handset penetration among smartphone users: roughly 55–65% (below Iowa’s ~65–75%, reflecting older devices and slower upgrade cycles).
- Mobile-only/phone-dependent internet households: estimated 20–25% (above the state average, reflecting patchier wired broadband outside towns).
- Prepaid share: modestly higher than statewide (budget/MVNO lines more common).
- Enterprise/IoT lines: higher per capita than state average due to agriculture (bin sensors, fleet trackers, field equipment).
Demographic patterns (vs. Iowa)
- Age: 65+ adoption lags the state by several points; seniors more likely to keep LTE-only or basic devices.
- Income: more price-sensitive plans and Android skew than statewide; family plans and MVNOs (e.g., Cricket, Straight Talk, Visible) are common.
- Youth: near-universal smartphone access among teens, but daytime data use shifts toward nearby cities (school/commute to Waterloo–Cedar Falls/Waverly).
- Occupation: agriculture and manufacturing drive above-average use of rugged devices and M2M connections.
Digital infrastructure and coverage
- Networks present: Verizon, AT&T/FirstNet, T‑Mobile, and UScellular. UScellular retains a noticeably larger share here than statewide due to rural coverage depth.
- 4G LTE: generally good in and between towns (Parkersburg, Aplington, Shell Rock, Clarksville, Allison, Greene), with occasional dead zones in river bottoms and sparsely populated townships.
- 5G:
- Low-band 5G (AT&T, T‑Mobile, Verizon DSS): broad but variable performance; often 30–100 Mbps outside towns.
- Mid-band 5G (especially T‑Mobile 2.5 GHz; pockets from AT&T/Verizon C‑band): mainly in/near towns and along primary corridors; 100–300+ Mbps where available.
- Fixed broadband interplay: fiber is present in some towns and along select rural routes (often via local telco/coop builds), but coverage is uneven; many farmsteads use LTE/5G fixed wireless or satellite as primary/backup service.
- Public safety: FirstNet adoption is visible among agencies; coverage improvements tend to follow AT&T macro upgrades on main corridors.
How Butler County differs from Iowa overall
- Lower smartphone and 5G device penetration, tied to older demographics and longer upgrade cycles.
- Higher reliance on mobile as primary home internet, due to uneven wired broadband outside municipal cores.
- UScellular retains meaningful market share locally, unlike its smaller statewide profile.
- More IoT/M2M lines per capita due to agriculture and small-fleet logistics.
- Slightly higher prepaid/MVNO usage and stronger Android skew from price sensitivity.
- Speed variability is greater: solid LTE and mid-band 5G in town; noticeable performance drops in exurban stretches and river valleys compared with statewide averages.
Notes and validation tips
- Treat figures as reasoned estimates based on rural Iowa usage patterns, ACS/FCC trends, and carrier build-outs through 2024. For planning, verify with: FCC National Broadband Map for fixed/5G availability, carrier native coverage maps and mid-band 5G layers, and local providers (telco/coop) for fiber footprints and current projects.
Social Media Trends in Butler County
Here’s a concise, practical snapshot based on the best available public research (Pew Research 2023–2024) adjusted for rural communities and Butler County’s size/demographics. County-specific platform data isn’t published, so figures are estimates and shown as ranges.
County snapshot
- Population: ~14K; adults (18+): ~10.5–11.5K
- Connectivity: smartphone adoption ~85–90%; home broadband ~70–80%
- Social media penetration (any platform): adults ~80–85%; teens ~95%+
Most-used platforms (estimated share of residents who use the platform) Adults (18+)
- YouTube: 75–80%
- Facebook: 65–70%
- Instagram: 30–40%
- Pinterest: 28–35%
- TikTok: 22–28%
- Snapchat: 20–25%
- LinkedIn: 18–22%
- X/Twitter: 12–18%
- Reddit: 10–15%
- Nextdoor: 2–5%
Teens (13–17)
- YouTube: 90–95%
- Snapchat: 60–70%
- TikTok: 60–70%
- Instagram: 55–65%
- Discord: 25–35%
- Reddit: 20–30%
- Facebook: 20–30%
- X/Twitter: 15–25%
Age-group patterns (adults)
- 18–29: heavy on Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok; DMs > public posts; YouTube for music/how‑to.
- 30–49: Facebook for Groups/Marketplace/events; Instagram growing; YouTube for how‑to, product research; TikTok rising.
- 50–64: Facebook daily use; YouTube; Pinterest common; cautious but increasing TikTok viewing via shares/Reels.
- 65+: Facebook and Messenger dominate; YouTube for news/weather/how‑to; minimal use elsewhere.
Gender skews (adults; tendencies)
- Women: higher on Facebook, Instagram, Pinterest; moderate TikTok, Snapchat.
- Men: higher on YouTube, Reddit, X/Twitter; somewhat higher on LinkedIn; moderate Facebook/Instagram.
Behavioral trends to know
- Facebook is the local hub: town/community groups, school and youth sports updates, local news/obits, fundraisers, lost/found, and heavy Marketplace use.
- Short-form video works: locally relevant 15–30s clips (sports highlights, farm/rural life, events) perform best on Facebook Reels/TikTok; many watch with sound off—use captions.
- Messaging > commenting: residents often shift to Messenger/SMS/Snapchat to coordinate (appointments, buys/sells, volunteering).
- Trust and locality: posts from known local entities (schools, churches, first responders, small businesses) get strong engagement; photos with recognizable people/places outperform.
- Timing: peaks early morning (6–8 a.m.) and evenings (7–10 p.m.); weekend posts and live event coverage travel further.
- Seasonality: spikes around school sports seasons, county fair, severe-weather events, planting/harvest windows.
- Ads/targeting: best ROI from tight geofencing around main towns (e.g., Allison, Parkersburg, Aplington, Clarksville, Greene, Shell Rock, New Hartford); use Facebook/Instagram for reach, YouTube pre-roll for awareness, Snapchat/TikTok for 13–29.
Notes on data
- Estimates blend Pew Research Center’s 2023–2024 social media use (with rural adjustments) and ACS county demographics. For exact local percentages, pair this with platform ad audience tools or a short community survey.
Table of Contents
Other Counties in Iowa
- Adair
- Adams
- Allamakee
- Appanoose
- Audubon
- Benton
- Black Hawk
- Boone
- Bremer
- Buchanan
- Buena Vista
- Calhoun
- Carroll
- Cass
- Cedar
- Cerro Gordo
- Cherokee
- Chickasaw
- Clarke
- Clay
- Clayton
- Clinton
- Crawford
- Dallas
- Davis
- Decatur
- Delaware
- Des Moines
- Dickinson
- Dubuque
- Emmet
- Fayette
- Floyd
- Franklin
- Fremont
- Greene
- Grundy
- Guthrie
- Hamilton
- Hancock
- Hardin
- Harrison
- Henry
- Howard
- Humboldt
- Ida
- Iowa
- Jackson
- Jasper
- Jefferson
- Johnson
- Jones
- Keokuk
- Kossuth
- Lee
- Linn
- Louisa
- Lucas
- Lyon
- Madison
- Mahaska
- Marion
- Marshall
- Mills
- Mitchell
- Monona
- Monroe
- Montgomery
- Muscatine
- Obrien
- Osceola
- Page
- Palo Alto
- Plymouth
- Pocahontas
- Polk
- Pottawattamie
- Poweshiek
- Ringgold
- Sac
- Scott
- Shelby
- Sioux
- Story
- Tama
- Taylor
- Union
- Van Buren
- Wapello
- Warren
- Washington
- Wayne
- Webster
- Winnebago
- Winneshiek
- Woodbury
- Worth
- Wright