Lincoln County is a county in eastern Washington, located in the state’s Columbia Plateau region between the Spokane metropolitan area to the east and the Columbia River to the west. Created in 1883 and named for President Abraham Lincoln, it developed around railroad-era agriculture and remains closely tied to the broader Inland Northwest wheat belt. The county is small in population, with roughly 10,000–11,000 residents, and a low-density settlement pattern anchored by a handful of small towns. Davenport serves as the county seat and primary administrative center. Lincoln County is predominantly rural, with an economy based largely on dryland farming and related services, alongside local government and small-scale trade. The landscape is characterized by rolling loess hills, broad open fields, and scabland features typical of the Columbia Basin, reflecting the area’s glacial and flood geology. Community life is shaped by agricultural traditions and small-town institutions.

Lincoln County Local Demographic Profile

Lincoln County is a rural county in east-central Washington, situated on the Columbia Plateau between the Spokane area and the Tri-Cities region. The county seat is Davenport, and the county includes small communities and extensive agricultural land (county information and services are available via the Lincoln County official website).

Population Size

According to the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts for Lincoln County, Washington, Lincoln County had:

  • Population (2020 Census): 10,876
  • Population (July 1, 2023 estimate): 10,778

Age & Gender

From the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts (most recent ACS-based profile values shown on that page):

  • Age distribution
    • Under 18 years: 18.1%
    • 65 years and over: 25.6%
  • Gender ratio
    • QuickFacts provides sex breakdown (male/female) for the county on the same page; this is the official county-level source for the current male–female distribution.

Racial & Ethnic Composition

According to the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts, Lincoln County’s population is reported by race and Hispanic/Latino ethnicity (separately from race). Key measures include:

  • White alone
  • Black or African American alone
  • American Indian and Alaska Native alone
  • Asian alone
  • Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone
  • Two or more races
  • Hispanic or Latino (of any race)

(Exact percentages for each category are listed directly on the QuickFacts page for Lincoln County.)

Household & Housing Data

From the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts, Lincoln County household and housing indicators include:

  • Number of households
  • Average household size
  • Owner-occupied housing unit rate
  • Median value of owner-occupied housing units
  • Median selected monthly owner costs (with and without a mortgage)
  • Median gross rent
  • Housing units (total count)

(Each metric is reported with its corresponding year or survey period on the QuickFacts page.)

Email Usage

Lincoln County, Washington is a largely rural, low-density county where long distances between towns and limited last‑mile infrastructure shape residents’ ability to access digital communications such as email.

Direct county-level email usage rates are generally not published; broadband subscription, device access, and demographics are standard proxies for likely email access and adoption. The U.S. Census Bureau (data.census.gov) provides county indicators on household broadband subscriptions and computer ownership, which serve as the most comparable measures of practical email access. Areas with lower broadband subscription or lower computer access typically face more reliance on smartphones, public access points, or intermittent connectivity, affecting consistent email use.

Age distribution is relevant because older populations tend to adopt online services and email at lower rates than younger adults; county age structure from the American Community Survey is therefore a key proxy for expected email adoption.

Gender distribution is usually a weaker predictor of email access than age and connectivity; county sex composition is available via the same Census sources.

Connectivity constraints in rural counties commonly include limited provider competition and uneven fixed broadband coverage; infrastructure context is summarized by the FCC National Broadband Map.

Mobile Phone Usage

Lincoln County is a largely rural county in eastern Washington, centered on Davenport and extending across the Channeled Scablands and Palouse-adjacent agricultural areas. Low population density, long distances between towns, and irregular terrain (coulees/scabland channels) contribute to uneven cellular coverage and to a stronger reliance on fixed locations (home, farm operations, highways) for dependable connectivity than is typical in urban counties. County geography, population, and housing context are documented in U.S. Census profiles such as Census.gov QuickFacts for Lincoln County, Washington.

Key definitions used in this overview (availability vs. adoption)

  • Network availability (supply): Whether mobile broadband service is reported as available in an area (coverage footprints, advertised service levels, and presence of 4G/5G).
  • Household adoption (demand): Whether residents actually subscribe to mobile service and use mobile internet, and whether smartphones are present in households.

County-level mobile adoption metrics are limited compared with statewide or national sources; where Lincoln County–specific values are not published, this overview cites authoritative datasets and states limitations.

Mobile penetration or access indicators (adoption where available)

Household internet subscription and “cellular data only” reliance (county-level where available)

The most consistently available county-level indicators come from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS), which measures internet subscription types at the household level (including households that rely on cellular data plans). These data distinguish households with:

  • Any internet subscription
  • Broadband such as cable/fiber/DSL
  • Cellular data plan only (no fixed subscription)

County-level ACS tables and profiles can be accessed via data.census.gov (search “Lincoln County, Washington internet subscription” and select the ACS 5-year tables for the most reliable rural sample sizes).
Limitation: ACS reflects household subscription patterns, not the full mobile “penetration” concept (unique subscribers per 100 people) used by telecom industry sources, which are generally not published at county resolution.

Device ownership (smartphone vs. other) at county level

The Census Bureau does not publish a standard county-level “smartphone ownership” series comparable to subscription tables, and major smartphone-ownership surveys typically report at national or state levels. As a result, direct county-level smartphone penetration estimates for Lincoln County are not consistently available from public statistical series. Adoption is more reliably inferred through ACS internet-subscription categories (especially “cellular data plan only”) and through statewide surveys.

Mobile internet usage patterns (4G/5G availability and practical connectivity)

Reported mobile broadband coverage (network availability)

The primary public source for mobile coverage reporting in the U.S. is the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). FCC datasets can be used to review where providers report 4G LTE and 5G service and to compare coverage claims across technologies:

  • FCC National Broadband Map (select Lincoln County or specific census locations; view mobile broadband layers, technology types, and provider-reported service)

Limitation: FCC mobile coverage is largely based on provider-submitted propagation models and may overstate practical usability in rural terrain, indoors, or in coulees and low-lying areas. Availability on a map does not equal reliable service at street level.

4G LTE vs. 5G in a rural county context

  • 4G LTE is generally the foundational mobile broadband layer across rural Washington, including most travel corridors and towns, with service quality dependent on tower spacing and terrain.
  • 5G availability in rural counties tends to be concentrated near population centers and major highways, and may be provided via:
    • Low-band 5G (broader reach, often similar real-world performance to LTE)
    • More limited mid-band coverage in less dense areas, with faster speeds where deployed

The FCC map provides the most defensible public record of where 5G is reported as available in Lincoln County at a granular level.

On-the-ground performance indicators (measured usage experience)

Public speed-test aggregation can provide an additional view of practical performance patterns, but results reflect where people test (often in towns and along roads) rather than a complete geographic sample:

Limitation: Crowd-sourced speed tests are not a comprehensive availability measure and are biased toward locations with users and service.

Common device types (smartphones vs. other devices)

What is known with high confidence (generalizable patterns)

In the U.S., mobile internet access is predominantly smartphone-based, with additional usage via tablets and cellular hotspots. In rural counties, fixed wireless and satellite may complement or substitute for mobile broadband at home, while smartphones remain the primary personal device for voice/SMS and app-based services.

What is not reliably published at Lincoln County level (explicit limitation)

Public, authoritative datasets that break down Lincoln County residents by smartphone vs. basic phone vs. hotspot-only ownership are not typically available. The best county-level proxy for “mobile-first” dependence is the ACS measure of households with cellular data plan only via data.census.gov, which indicates households that rely on mobile networks for internet rather than subscribing to a fixed service.

Demographic and geographic factors influencing mobile usage in Lincoln County

Rural settlement pattern and tower economics (availability driver)

Lincoln County’s sparse settlement pattern increases the per-user cost of building and maintaining dense cellular networks. This commonly results in:

  • Larger coverage cells and fewer towers per square mile than in urban counties
  • More variable indoor coverage, especially in homes with metal roofing or outbuildings typical of agricultural areas
  • Greater reliance on coverage along highways and within incorporated towns

Terrain and land cover (signal propagation)

The county’s scabland channels, coulees, and rolling agricultural topography can create localized coverage shadows. Even where a provider reports coverage, terrain-driven line-of-sight limitations can reduce consistency, particularly away from main roads.

Household characteristics and age structure (adoption driver)

ACS demographic profiles for Lincoln County (age distribution, income, housing tenure, and commuting patterns) provide context for adoption differences that are widely observed in rural areas:

  • Older populations generally show lower rates of mobile-only internet reliance and lower smartphone adoption than younger cohorts.
  • Lower population density and higher travel distances increase the value of dependable mobile coverage for commuting and field work, while adoption is constrained by affordability and service quality.

County demographic context is available through Census.gov QuickFacts and more detailed ACS tables via data.census.gov.
Limitation: These demographic sources do not directly measure mobile device type ownership; they provide correlates (age, income, housing, commuting) commonly used to interpret adoption patterns.

Distinguishing network availability from household adoption (summary)

  • Network availability in Lincoln County: Best documented through the FCC National Broadband Map, which provides provider-reported 4G/5G coverage footprints and is the primary public reference for where mobile broadband is advertised as available.
  • Household adoption in Lincoln County: Best documented through ACS household internet subscription tables via data.census.gov, including the key indicator for mobile reliance: households with a cellular data plan only.
  • Device-type prevalence (smartphone vs. non-smartphone): Not consistently available at the county level from public statistical series; county-level discussion is therefore limited to indirect indicators (cellular-data-only subscriptions) rather than asserting specific smartphone penetration rates.

Relevant public agencies and planning context (connectivity ecosystem)

State and federal broadband programs influence tower siting, backhaul improvements, and mapping updates, which can affect both availability and adoption over time:

Data limitations (explicit): Publicly accessible, authoritative county-level statistics for smartphone ownership, mobile-only individual usage frequency, and carrier-specific subscriber penetration are limited. The most defensible county-specific measures are (1) FCC-reported mobile coverage availability and (2) ACS household subscription categories, particularly “cellular data plan only,” which captures mobile-reliant households rather than network footprint.

Social Media Trends

Lincoln County is a rural county in eastern Washington on the Columbia Plateau, with Davenport as the county seat and nearby population centers and service hubs including the Sprague area and connections to the Spokane metro via regional travel and media markets. Its economy is strongly oriented toward agriculture (notably wheat and other dryland farming) and public-sector services, and the county’s low population density and older age profile relative to Washington State shape how residents typically access information and maintain social ties online.

User statistics (penetration / active use)

  • Overall adult social media use (benchmark): Nationally, ~70% of U.S. adults use social media, according to the Pew Research Center social media fact sheet.
  • Local availability: Publicly available, county-specific “percent active on social platforms” estimates for Lincoln County, WA are not consistently published by major survey organizations at county granularity. As a result, county usage is generally contextualized using national and state-level benchmarks, combined with local demographics (rurality and age structure) that correlate with lower social media uptake and different platform mixes compared with large urban counties.

Age group trends (who uses social media most)

National survey patterns are the most reliable proxy for age gradients at the county level:

  • Highest use: Adults 18–29 show the highest social media adoption (nationally mid-80%+).
  • High but lower: Adults 30–49 typically report upper-70% to ~80% usage.
  • Moderate: Adults 50–64 are typically around ~60%.
  • Lowest: Adults 65+ are typically around ~40%.
    Source: Pew Research Center.

Implication for Lincoln County: a relatively older age distribution common in rural counties tends to shift the overall platform mix toward Facebook and away from youth-skewing platforms such as TikTok and Snapchat.

Gender breakdown

  • Overall use: Pew’s national findings generally show similar overall social media use by gender, with platform-level differences more pronounced than total adoption.
  • Platform differences: Women tend to report higher usage of visually oriented or socially networked platforms such as Pinterest and Instagram, while some discussion- and news-adjacent platforms show smaller or mixed gender gaps.
    Source: Pew Research Center (platform tables by demographic group).

Most-used platforms (share of U.S. adults; useful as county benchmarks)

Percentages below are national adult usage rates and are commonly used to describe local expectations when county-level platform surveys are unavailable:

Local expectation for Lincoln County (given rural context and age profile): Facebook and YouTube typically represent the broadest reach; Instagram and TikTok skew more toward younger residents; LinkedIn use concentrates among professional/white-collar segments and commuters tied to larger labor markets.

Behavioral trends (engagement patterns and preferences)

  • Video as a dominant format: YouTube’s broad penetration indicates that how-to, news clips, and entertainment video are central content formats across age groups (Pew Research Center).
  • Community information role of Facebook: In rural counties, Facebook commonly functions as a local bulletin board (community groups, events, school and civic updates), aligning with its older-skewing user base and strong network effects among established residents (platform reach documented by Pew Research Center).
  • Age-driven platform segmentation:
    • Younger adults concentrate more time in TikTok, Instagram, Snapchat, and video-first feeds.
    • Older adults concentrate more on Facebook and YouTube, with more emphasis on local/community updates and maintaining existing ties.
      Source: Pew Research Center.
  • News and information exposure: Social platforms are a significant pathway for news discovery nationally, and platform choice influences the mix of local vs. national information encountered (see Pew Research Center’s social media and news fact sheet).

Family & Associates Records

Lincoln County family and associate-related public records include vital records (birth and death) maintained at the state level, and local court, land, and marriage-related records maintained through county offices. Washington State Department of Health issues certified birth and death certificates; Lincoln County Public Health provides local guidance and may assist with ordering information (Lincoln County Public Health; Washington DOH Vital Records). Adoption records are handled under Washington state law and are generally restricted; access is managed through state processes rather than county open records (Washington DCYF Adoption Support).

Court records documenting family relationships (e.g., dissolution, parentage, guardianship) are filed with Lincoln County Superior Court and Lincoln County District Court; basic case information is commonly available through the statewide portal, with document access subject to court rules (Lincoln County Superior Court; Lincoln County District Court; Washington Courts – Odyssey Portal).

Property and recorded instruments that may reflect family associations (deeds, liens) are maintained by the Lincoln County Auditor/Recording; records are accessible in person and through posted search tools (Lincoln County Auditor). Privacy restrictions apply to vital records, adoptions, and sealed/redacted court filings; public access is limited to authorized parties for certain record types.

Marriage & Divorce Records

Types of records available

  • Marriage licenses and certificates

    • Marriage licensing in Lincoln County is handled at the county level. A marriage license is issued by the county, and the completed license is returned for recording after the ceremony.
    • Lincoln County maintains county marriage records as part of its public-record holdings.

  • Divorce records (dissolutions of marriage)

    • Divorce actions are court cases. The official record is the court file and resulting final decree (often titled “Decree of Dissolution of Marriage” or similar).
    • Divorce case records are maintained by the county superior court clerk as part of the judicial record.

  • Annulments (declarations of invalidity)

    • In Washington, an “annulment” is generally handled as a court action seeking a declaration that a marriage is invalid (often termed a “declaration of invalidity” rather than “annulment” in modern usage).
    • These records are also maintained in the superior court case file.

Where records are filed and how they can be accessed

  • Lincoln County Auditor (recorded marriage documents)

    • The Lincoln County Auditor is the local recording office for marriage-related documents, including the recorded marriage license/certificate.
    • Access is commonly available through the Auditor’s office public-record search tools and/or in-person requests.
    • Reference: Lincoln County Auditor (marriage licensing/recording) https://www.co.lincoln.wa.us/auditor

  • Lincoln County Superior Court Clerk (divorce and annulment case files)

    • Divorce decrees and declarations of invalidity are part of the Lincoln County Superior Court case record maintained by the Clerk.
    • Access typically occurs through the clerk’s records request process and court records systems for docket/case information, subject to confidentiality rules and redactions.
    • Reference: Lincoln County Clerk / Superior Court records https://www.co.lincoln.wa.us/clerk

  • Washington State Department of Health – Center for Health Statistics (statewide vital records)

Typical information included in these records

  • Marriage license / recorded marriage record

    • Full legal names of the parties
    • Date and place the license was issued
    • Date and place of marriage/ceremony
    • Officiant name and authority
    • Witness information (as applicable to the form used)
    • Signatures and recording information (auditor file number, recording date)
    • Additional items commonly captured on Washington marriage applications/records: ages or dates of birth, current addresses, prior marital status, and sometimes birthplaces (exact fields vary by form version and time period)

  • Divorce decree (decree of dissolution) and associated court record

    • Case caption and cause number
    • Names of the parties
    • Filing date and date the decree is entered
    • Findings/orders related to:
      • Legal dissolution of the marriage
      • Division of property and debts
      • Spousal maintenance (alimony), when ordered
      • Child-related provisions in cases with minor children (parenting plan, child support), typically as separate orders within the case file
    • Court clerk certification details for certified copies

  • Declaration of invalidity (annulment-type relief) and associated court record

    • Case caption and cause number
    • Names of the parties
    • Legal basis for invalidity and the court’s findings
    • Date entered and related orders (property, children, name restoration, as applicable)

Privacy and legal restrictions

  • Public records baseline with statutory exceptions

    • Recorded marriage documents maintained by the county auditor are generally treated as public records, subject to Washington public records law and specific confidentiality provisions.
    • Court records (including divorce and invalidity cases) are generally public, but Washington court rules and statutes restrict access to certain information.

  • Redaction and protected information

    • Washington courts require protection of personal identifiers in filings (commonly including Social Security numbers, financial account numbers, and certain dates of birth). Protected personal data may be redacted from publicly accessible versions.
    • Cases or documents involving minors, domestic violence protection, and some sealed/confidential filings can be restricted from public access in whole or in part.

  • Certified copies and access controls for vital records

    • State-issued certified copies of vital records (including marriage and divorce records held by the Department of Health) are subject to Washington’s vital records access and identification requirements and may be limited to eligible requestors depending on the record type and date.
    • Local offices may provide informational copies or record searches under local procedures, while certification requirements vary by office and record category.

Education, Employment and Housing

Lincoln County is a sparsely populated, predominantly rural county in eastern Washington centered on small agricultural communities such as Davenport (county seat), Harrington, Odessa, Reardan, and Wilbur, with a large share of land in farming and rangeland. Population size and density are low relative to Washington as a whole, and many households are oriented around agriculture, public services, and small-town retail and support businesses.

Education Indicators

Public school districts and schools (public)

Lincoln County’s public K–12 education is provided primarily through several small districts. School names and district configurations can change through consolidation or program-sharing; the most reliable current listings are maintained in the Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) directory and district webpages. Refer to OSPI’s Washington State school and district directory for the definitive, current list of public schools serving Lincoln County communities (commonly including Davenport, Harrington, Odessa, Reardan, and Wilbur).

Student–teacher ratios and graduation

  • Student–teacher ratios: Lincoln County districts are typically small and rural, which often yields lower student–teacher ratios than state averages, but ratios vary by district and grade level. OSPI publishes annual district staffing and enrollment that can be used to calculate ratios; the most recent official staffing/enrollment tables are available through OSPI’s data portal.
  • Graduation rates: Washington’s official on-time graduation rate is reported by OSPI at the district and school level. Lincoln County district graduation rates can be pulled directly from OSPI’s Washington State Report Card. Countywide aggregation is not always published as a single figure because outcomes are reported by school/district rather than by county.

Adult educational attainment (residents age 25+)

County-level adult attainment is consistently available via the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS).

  • High school diploma or higher: Lincoln County generally reports a high share of adults with at least a high school diploma, typical of rural eastern Washington counties.
  • Bachelor’s degree or higher: The share with a bachelor’s degree or higher is typically below Washington statewide averages, reflecting the county’s agricultural base and smaller professional-services sector. The most recent county estimates are available through the Census Bureau’s data.census.gov (ACS 5-year tables such as DP02/S1501).

Notable programs (STEM, CTE, AP/dual credit)

  • Career and Technical Education (CTE): Rural districts in Washington commonly emphasize CTE aligned with regional needs (ag mechanics, welding/fabrication, construction trades, business, health pathways), frequently delivered via district programs and regional skill centers. Washington CTE program reporting is coordinated through OSPI CTE; see OSPI Career & Technical Education.
  • Advanced Placement (AP) / dual credit: Small high schools often provide a mix of AP offerings, College in the High School, and Running Start (college dual enrollment). Participation varies by high school size and staffing; school-level course offerings are best verified through district course catalogs and the OSPI report card where available.

School safety measures and counseling resources

  • Safety planning: Washington public schools operate under state and district emergency operations requirements, typically including secure entry practices, visitor management, drills, and coordination with local law enforcement and emergency management. OSPI outlines statewide guidance under OSPI School Safety.
  • Student supports: Districts generally provide counseling services (school counselors; referrals to behavioral health supports), and many participate in multi-tiered systems of support. Availability can be constrained in small districts, with counselors sometimes shared across buildings.

Employment and Economic Conditions

Unemployment rate (most recent)

Lincoln County unemployment is reported monthly and annually through state and federal labor-market programs.

  • The most direct official source is the Washington Employment Security Department’s local area unemployment statistics (LAUS). Current and historical county rates are published via Washington ESD labor market information (county profiles/LAUS tables).
  • In general, Lincoln County’s unemployment tends to track rural eastern Washington patterns: seasonal fluctuations tied to agriculture and construction, with annual rates that vary year to year.

Major industries and employment sectors

Based on typical ACS/BEA/ESD profiles for Lincoln County and similar rural counties in the region, major sectors include:

  • Agriculture (crop production and support activities), including wheat and other dryland crops and associated services
  • Public administration and education (county government, schools)
  • Health care and social assistance (clinics, long-term care, social services)
  • Retail trade and accommodation/food services (small-town services)
  • Construction and transportation/warehousing (local construction, farm/logistics support) Industry shares can be verified in ACS “Industry by occupation” and ESD county employment profiles.

Common occupations and workforce breakdown

The occupational structure commonly shows higher proportions in:

  • Management, business, and office/administrative support (public administration, schools, small business)
  • Transportation and material moving (ag and regional freight)
  • Construction and extraction; installation/maintenance/repair
  • Healthcare support and practitioner roles (smaller but essential share)
  • Farming, fishing, and forestry (higher than state average) ACS occupation tables on data.census.gov provide the most recent county distributions.

Commuting patterns and mean commute time

  • Mode: Rural counties typically show a high share of driving alone, limited fixed-route transit, and small but present shares of carpooling and remote work.
  • Commute time: Mean commute time for Lincoln County is generally moderate compared with metropolitan counties, but commuting can be longer for residents working in Spokane-area or other regional job centers. The most recent mean travel time to work is available in ACS commuting tables (e.g., DP03) via data.census.gov.

Local employment vs. out-of-county work

  • A meaningful share of workers in rural counties commute across county lines for specialized jobs and higher-wage employment, while local employment is concentrated in agriculture, schools, local government, and basic services.
  • The most standardized commuting-flow measurement is available through the Census Bureau’s LEHD OnTheMap (inflow/outflow and “where workers live vs. where they work”), which provides county-to-county commuting flows.

Housing and Real Estate

Homeownership and rental share

  • Lincoln County is typically characterized by high homeownership and a smaller rental market than urban counties, consistent with small-town and rural housing stock.
  • The most recent homeownership rate (owner-occupied share) is reported in ACS housing profiles (DP04) on data.census.gov.

Median property values and recent trends

  • Median home value: ACS provides the median value of owner-occupied housing units for Lincoln County (DP04).
  • Trends: Lincoln County experienced the broader Washington-state housing appreciation in the late 2010s through early 2020s, though typically at lower absolute price levels than the Seattle metro. Recent year-to-year changes can be tracked through ACS time series and supplementary sources such as the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) house price index; FHFA data can be accessed via FHFA House Price Index (note: county coverage varies; metro/non-metro series may be more applicable).

Typical rent prices

  • The most consistent countywide measure is ACS median gross rent (DP04).
  • Rural counties generally show lower median rents than Washington statewide, with limited multifamily inventory and more single-family rentals.

Housing types and built environment

  • Housing stock: Predominantly single-family detached homes, manufactured homes, farmhouses on rural parcels, and small numbers of duplexes/apartments concentrated in town centers (Davenport, Odessa, Reardan, Wilbur, Harrington).
  • Rural lots and acreage: A notable share of housing is on larger lots outside town limits, often tied to agricultural land ownership patterns. ACS tables on structure type (1-unit detached, 2–4 units, 5+ units, mobile homes) provide the county’s distribution.

Neighborhood characteristics (amenities and schools)

  • Town-center living: In incorporated towns, housing is generally closer to schools, local government services, libraries, and small retail corridors; walkability is higher than in unincorporated areas but limited by small-town scale.
  • Unincorporated/rural areas: Greater distances to schools, healthcare, and groceries; reliance on personal vehicles; proximity to farmland and open space is common.

Property tax overview (rates and typical homeowner cost)

  • Washington property taxes are administered by county assessors and treasurers, with rates varying by taxing district (schools, county, city, fire, hospital, and other levies).
  • Lincoln County property tax details (levy rates by district, billing, and payment information) are maintained by the Lincoln County Treasurer and Assessor; county government resources are accessible via Lincoln County, Washington official website.
  • For a comparable statewide framework (how Washington property taxes are calculated and limited), see the Washington Department of Revenue’s explanation of Washington property tax.
  • A single “average rate” is not fully representative because levy rates differ by location within the county; typical homeowner cost depends on assessed value and the applicable local levy mix.

Data note: Several requested indicators (student–teacher ratios, graduation rates, and program availability) are reported at the district/school level rather than as a consolidated county statistic. The most recent authoritative values for Lincoln County schools are available through OSPI’s report card and directory, while countywide demographic, commuting, and housing medians are best sourced from the ACS 5-year estimates on data.census.gov.

Table of Contents

Other Counties in Washington