Grafton County Local Demographic Profile

Key demographics for Grafton County, NH (U.S. Census Bureau, 2019–2023 ACS 5-year estimates; tables DP05, S0101, S1101)

Population

  • Total: ~92,000 (2020 Census baseline: 91,118)

Age

  • Median age: ~44 years
  • Under 18: ~17%
  • 18–24: ~11%
  • 25–44: ~23%
  • 45–64: ~28%
  • 65 and over: ~21%

Gender

  • Female: ~50–51%
  • Male: ~49–50%

Race and ethnicity

  • White alone, non-Hispanic: ~87–88%
  • Hispanic or Latino (any race): ~3–4%
  • Asian alone: ~4–5%
  • Black or African American alone: ~1–2%
  • Two or more races: ~3–4%
  • American Indian and Alaska Native alone: ~0.5%
  • Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone: ~0.1%

Households

  • Total households: ~37,000; families: ~21,000
  • Average household size: ~2.3; average family size: ~2.9
  • Family households: ~56–58% of households
  • Households with children under 18: ~23–24%
  • One-person households: ~30–33% (65+ living alone: ~12–13%)
  • Tenure: ~71–72% owner-occupied; ~28–29% renter-occupied

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019–2023 (5-year).

Email Usage in Grafton County

Grafton County, NH — email usage snapshot (estimates)

  • Estimated users: 66–75k residents use email regularly (county pop ≈91k; based on NH/US internet and email adoption rates from ACS/Pew).
  • Age distribution (share using email):
    • 18–29: ~98–99%
    • 30–49: ~95–97%
    • 50–64: ~90–93%
    • 65+: ~75–80%
  • Gender split: roughly even; no meaningful difference in email adoption by gender.

Digital access and trends

  • Broadband subscription: ~85–90% of households (lower in rural northern/western towns; higher around Lebanon–Hanover–Plymouth).
  • Growing fiber and cable upgrades along the I‑89 corridor and college/medical hubs; mobile broadband fills gaps in outlying areas.
  • Remote work and higher-education presence (Dartmouth College, Plymouth State University) sustain high email reliance among students, faculty, healthcare, and tech workers.
  • Public libraries and schools provide Wi‑Fi access that supports older adults and lower‑income households.

Local density/connectivity context

  • Population density ≈50–55 people per square mile (well below the NH average), leading to uneven last‑mile infrastructure but strong connectivity in the Lebanon/Hanover metro area anchored by Dartmouth‑Hitchcock Medical Center.

Mobile Phone Usage in Grafton County

Gist

  • Grafton County’s mobile usage is bifurcated: very high adoption and heavy data use in the Hanover–Lebanon–Plymouth–Littleton corridor, but more coverage gaps and capacity constraints than the New Hampshire average in its mountainous and sparsely populated towns.
  • The presence of Dartmouth College, Plymouth State University, and Dartmouth Health skews the user base younger and more data‑intensive than the state overall, while the large retiree share keeps a meaningful slice of lower-intensity users and voice-first households.

User estimates (transparent, model-based)

  • Population baseline: ~90–95k residents; adults ≈ 75–80k.
  • Smartphone users: 64–72k adults (assumes 85–90% adult smartphone adoption; U.S. 2023 Pew ≈ 88%, with rural/older areas a bit lower and college clusters higher).
  • Total mobile lines (including tablets, wearables, work lines): roughly 95–115k active subscriptions countywide (using a 1.05–1.20 lines-per-resident range common in U.S. markets).
  • Wireless-only voice households: likely mid-to-high 60% range, a few points below statewide (NH is typically ~70%+), reflecting Grafton’s older/rural mix.

Demographic patterns that differ from the NH average

  • Age mix is more bimodal:
    • Larger 18–24 share than the state (Dartmouth in Hanover; Plymouth State in Plymouth) → higher smartphone penetration, 5G device share, and app-driven usage.
    • Above-average 65+ share in many towns (e.g., Haverhill area, parts of the Lakes/White Mountains fringe) → slightly more basic-plan usage, voice/SMS reliance, and Wi‑Fi calling at home.
  • Income and plan tiers:
    • Hanover–Lebanon medical/tech professionals skew to premium unlimited plans and newer iPhone/Android cycles.
    • Rural western/northern towns show more price-sensitive plans/MVNOs and longer device replacement cycles.
  • Commuting and cross-border patterns:
    • Strong cross-river ties with Vermont (White River Junction, Norwich) lead to frequent sector handoffs to sites west of the Connecticut River; residents near the river often see VT market identifiers even when not “roaming.”
  • Seasonal swings:
    • Tourism (Franconia/Lincoln/Kinsman Notch, Cannon/Bretton Woods access via I‑93/US‑3) produces weekend/holiday load spikes that are more pronounced than the state average, stressing uplink in trailhead/valley sectors.

Digital infrastructure highlights

  • Coverage/technology:
    • 5G is established along I‑89 (Lebanon/West Lebanon), I‑93 (Plymouth to Littleton), and in larger towns (Hanover, Lebanon, Plymouth, Littleton, Lincoln/Woodstock). Mid-band 5G capacity is best in the Upper Valley and along I‑93; rural valleys often fall back to LTE.
    • Notable weak/zero-coverage zones (more prevalent than statewide): parts of Franconia Notch, Kinsman Notch (NH‑112), stretches of NH‑118/US‑302, and forested hollows north and west of Plymouth.
  • Carriers (general reception patterns):
    • Verizon: typically the most consistent rural footprint, strong along I‑93 and in backcountry-adjacent areas; good building penetration in Hanover/Lebanon with C‑band where deployed.
    • AT&T: broadly solid in towns and along interstates; FirstNet buildouts have improved public-safety and fringe coverage in recent years.
    • T‑Mobile: markedly improved since 600 MHz rollout; strong in towns (Hanover, Lebanon, Plymouth, Littleton) but still variable in mountain valleys and remote lake districts.
  • Sites and backhaul:
    • Macro sites cluster along I‑89/I‑91 (Upper Valley) and I‑93/US‑3 corridors; infill small cells/DAS appear around campus/medical complexes in Hanover–Lebanon.
    • Fiber backhaul has expanded since 2022 via Consolidated/Fidium and NH Electric Cooperative’s NH Broadband builds in rural Grafton, which has improved sector capacity and reduced congestion in some town centers.
  • Reliance on Wi‑Fi calling:
    • Above state average in rural neighborhoods and along lake/mountain roads where indoor LTE/5G is inconsistent.

Usage behaviors that stand out locally

  • Heavy telehealth and clinical app use tied to Dartmouth Health; video visits and secure messaging are a larger share of upstream data than in many NH counties.
  • Student-driven peaks (move-in, exams, events) in Hanover and Plymouth cause dense, time-bound demand spikes that are atypical outside college towns.
  • Outdoor/recreation mapping, offline downloads, and emergency-messaging app usage are more common due to hiking/ski areas and known dead zones.

How Grafton County differs from statewide trends (bottom line)

  • More polarized user base: very high-end, high-data users in the Upper Valley and college towns, alongside lower-intensity, coverage‑constrained users in rural/mountain communities.
  • Higher incidence of coverage gaps and terrain-limited capacity than the NH average, despite good interstate-corridor service.
  • Larger seasonal and event-driven traffic volatility (tourism plus university cycles) than most NH counties.
  • Slightly lower share of wireless-only voice households than the statewide figure, tempered by an older rural population—but higher 5G device penetration in the Hanover–Lebanon–Plymouth axis than the state average.

Notes on sources and method

  • Population/demographics: based on recent ACS/Census county estimates and known institutional presence (Dartmouth College, Plymouth State University).
  • Adoption rates: derived from Pew Research Center’s U.S. smartphone adoption and CDC NHIS wireless-only voice benchmarks, adjusted for rural age structure and university effects.
  • Coverage/infrastructure: synthesized from FCC/NH carrier maps, carrier announcements, and observed deployment patterns (5G mid-band along interstates, fiber backhaul expansions since 2022). Exact tower counts and carrier market shares are not published at county granularity; figures above are qualitative or modeled ranges.

Social Media Trends in Grafton County

Below is a concise, planning-ready snapshot. Note: Platform-specific, county-level stats aren’t publicly reported; figures are estimates using Pew Research’s 2024 U.S. adult usage rates applied to Grafton County’s adult population (~71,000; county pop ~91k).

User stats (adults 18+)

  • Estimated adults using at least one social platform: ~55–60k (≈80–85% of adults)
  • Device mix: Heavily mobile-first; desktop usage higher during work hours in Lebanon/Hanover.

Most-used platforms (estimated adult reach in Grafton County)

  • YouTube: 83% (59k adults)
  • Facebook: 68% (48k)
  • Instagram: 47% (33k)
  • Pinterest: 35% (25k)
  • TikTok: 33% (23k)
  • Snapchat: 30% (21k)
  • LinkedIn: 30% (21k)
  • X (Twitter): 22% (16k)
  • Reddit: 22% (16k) Note: Facebook Groups and Marketplace have outsized local utility despite overall Facebook usage trends.

Age groups (behavioral patterns)

  • 13–24 (influenced by Dartmouth and Plymouth State communities): Heavy Snapchat/Instagram/TikTok; event coordination via IG Stories/Snap; local food/coffee/ski/hike content; quick-response to campus and weather updates.
  • 25–44: Facebook + Instagram dominant; Reels/TikTok growing; Marketplace for housing, gear, and baby/kid items; LinkedIn for DHMC/Dartmouth professionals.
  • 45–64: Facebook Groups for schools/rec sports/town info; YouTube for home/DIY; less TikTok, more FB Reels.
  • 65+: Facebook and YouTube; active in town and neighborhood groups; minimal TikTok/Snapchat.

Gender breakdown (directional)

  • Women: Over-index on Facebook, Instagram, Pinterest; strong participation in local buy-sell-trade, childcare, school and community groups.
  • Men: Over-index on YouTube, Reddit, X, LinkedIn; strong in sports/outdoors, tech, policy threads.
  • Teens/young women: Higher TikTok/Snapchat creation and consumption; teens/young men: more YouTube/Reddit.

Local behavioral trends

  • Community hubs: Facebook Groups for “Upper Valley,” Hanover/Lebanon/Plymouth classifieds, yard sales, road conditions, school/rec sports; rapid amplification during storms, closures, and town-meeting season.
  • Commerce: Facebook Marketplace dominates for cars, outdoor gear, rentals; Instagram key for boutiques, cafes, salons; seasonal service promos (plowing, landscaping) surge.
  • Seasonality: Spikes in IG/TikTok during foliage and ski seasons (Franconia/Lincoln/Loon) and summer hiking; visitor posts boost hashtag traffic more than resident counts.
  • Content formats: Short-form video (Reels/TikTok) strongest for 18–34; YouTube long-form for how-to/gear reviews; photo carousels for real estate and tourism.
  • Posting/engagement windows: Morning commute (7–9 am), lunch (11:30–1), evening (7–10 pm); weather events and school announcements cause sharp engagement peaks.
  • Civic/info flow: Town budgets, school board updates, parking bans, and NHDOT/511NH shares spread fastest via Facebook Groups and cross-posts to X/Reddit.
  • Cross-border media: Upper Valley overlap with VT pages and forums; regional news pages act as shared public squares.

How to use this

  • Target Facebook/IG for broad local reach; layer YouTube for education/evergreen; add TikTok/Reels for seasonal tourism and student segments; use LinkedIn for healthcare/education recruiting; deploy Facebook Groups/Marketplace for hyperlocal conversion.